Does formula exist for this sum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter db453r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sum \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{i}{2^i}\), with participants exploring whether a formula exists for this series. The conversation includes attempts to clarify the expression, references to external resources, and methods for solving the sum, including both computational and analytical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially presents the sum \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{i}{2^i}\) and expresses difficulty in finding a formula for it.
  • Another participant references a previous discussion on Physics Forums that may provide insights into the series.
  • A participant corrects the initial misunderstanding by clarifying that the sum should be \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{i}{2^i}\) instead of \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{n}{2^n}\), which is a different expression.
  • A later reply suggests using Wolfram Alpha to compute the sum, sharing the output it provided.
  • Another participant introduces a method involving an auxiliary function to derive the sum, detailing a differentiation technique that relates to the original sum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a definitive formula for the sum. There are multiple approaches and methods discussed, but no single solution is agreed upon.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various mathematical techniques and references to external computational tools, but the limitations of each method and the assumptions involved are not fully explored or resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying series in mathematics, particularly in the context of sums involving exponential decay, as well as individuals looking for computational methods to evaluate such sums.

db453r
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[i/2^i]

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.

EDITED: To correct mistake.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
db453r said:
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[n/2^n]
That one's easy. There's nothing inside the sum that depends on i, so your sum is the same as ##\frac n {2^n}\sum_{i=1}^n 1##.

Do you mean ##\sum_{i=1}^n \frac i {2^i}## ?

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.
Have you tried Wolfram alpha, www.wolframalpha.com ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oops. Yeah, that's what I meant.
 
Wow. Didn't know Wolfram could do that. Thanks.

Here's what it gave me:

\sum_{i=0}^{n} i/2^{-i} = 2^{-n}(-n+2^{n+1} -2)
 
You can solve this by hand by using a neat trick.
Form the auxiliary function (*):
F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}(\frac{x}{2})^{i}, that is, F(x) is readily seen to be related to a geometric sum, with alternate expression (**):
F(x)=\frac{1-(\frac{x}{2})^{n+1}}{1-\frac{x}{2}}-1
Now, the neat trick consists of differentiating (*), and we get:
F'(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*x^{i-1}2^{-i}
that is, we have:
F'(1)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*2^{-i}
which is your original sum!

Thus, you may calculate that sum by differentiating (**) instead, and evaluate the expression you get at x=1
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K