Does gravity affect Brownian Motion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of gravity on Brownian motion, particularly comparing conditions on the International Space Station (ISS) to those on Earth. It highlights that while passive diffusion rates differ in microgravity, the random walk of particles like pollen may not necessarily slow down due to gravity. The Langevin equation, specifically the term incorporating gravity, is introduced as a model to understand these dynamics. Chandrasekhar's 1943 paper on Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy is referenced for its insights into the effects of gravity on particle motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Brownian motion and its principles
  • Familiarity with the Langevin equation and its components
  • Knowledge of microgravity effects on physical processes
  • Basic grasp of stochastic processes in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Langevin equation in detail, focusing on its applications in particle dynamics
  • Research Chandrasekhar's 1943 paper on Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy
  • Explore the effects of microgravity on diffusion and convection processes
  • Investigate the role of temperature and density in Brownian motion dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in fluid dynamics, and anyone interested in the effects of gravity on particle motion and diffusion processes.

dedocta
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Brownian motion of free falling ISS vs Brownian Motion on Earth
I know passive diffusion rates behave differently on the International Space Station relative to Earth (video of a contained flame experiment burning up there.) However, does the random walk of pollen particles etc. have slowed velocity in comparison to that on Earth? Has been bugging me for a while, as I was wondering how our biology deals with slower Brownian mtion if so...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chandrasekhar wrote an excellent paper on Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy in 1943. You can find his paper in N. Wax's Book in Dover, "Selected Papers..." To make a long story short, in an early chapter, Chandrasekar demonstrates the exponential atmpsphere is the steady state solution for a falling particle with viscous damping rebounding from a fixed surface (the ground). The nice feature of the paper is that it also demonstrates the transient (i.e. time dependent) solution showing how the equilibrium solution is approached. Wax's book has many good papers along these lines.
 
dedocta said:
Summary:: Brownian motion of free falling ISS vs Brownian Motion on Earth

video of a contained flame experiment burning up there.
That has less to do with diffusion differences and more to do with the fact that convection operates differently in microgravity. Basically, hot air rises in a gravitational field because it is less dense than cold air. In microgravity, this buoyant force doesn’t exist or is much smaller, so that the hot carbon dioxide generated by a flame does not rise away from the flame to make way for fresh air to sustain the reaction.
dedocta said:
Summary:: Brownian motion of free falling ISS vs Brownian Motion on Earth

However, does the random walk of pollen particles etc. have slowed velocity in comparison to that on Earth? Has been bugging me for a while, as I was wondering how our biology deals with slower Brownian mtion if so...
You can model this straightforwardly by adding a gravity term to the Langevin equation
$$\dot{\mathbf{v}}=-\gamma\mathbf{v}+\sigma\mathbf{\xi}(t)-\mathbf{g}$$
Gravity will pull denser particles in the direction of the gravitational source, but if the noise term is large (at higher T, for instance), or the drag term is large (at higher density, for instance), then gravity will become irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
update on my earlier post. N.B. the page 57 of the Chadrasekhar paper concerning gravity effects on Brownian motio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
10K