Does Gravity "Lose" Pulling Power?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Learnphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses the misconception that gravity may lose its pulling power after performing work, similar to how a permanent magnet can lose magnetism. Participants clarify that gravity, as one of the four primary forces, does not fade over time and its influence diminishes with distance, following an inverse square law. The conservation of energy principle is correctly applied to explain that gravitational force is not "used up" but rather transforms potential energy into kinetic energy as objects move. Thus, gravity's action is effectively infinite, contingent on the presence of another mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and its properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of conservation of energy
  • Knowledge of the inverse square law in physics
  • Basic principles of magnetism and atomic alignment
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the inverse square law and its implications in gravitational physics
  • Explore the principles of conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Study the differences between gravitational and magnetic forces
  • Investigate the behavior of gravitational fields at varying distances
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of gravity and energy conservation.

Learnphysics
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Well, i know i might be far oversimplifying this as its not understood properly by science yet but.

A permanent magnet seems to lose its magnetism slowly as it does work on other objects. (conservation of energy)

Is this in any way true for gravity, does a mass "lose" its pulling power after doing sufficient work. (of course we've never observed this happening).

And if this DOESN'T happen, isn't gravitational "pulling" is essentially infinite? sure you have to put in kinetic energy to increase the Gravitational potential energy, (the object has to start at a distance AWAY from the gravity-causing-mass) but other then that, can the pulling power of gravity be described as infinite, only dependent on the existence of another object with which to exert itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

You seem to be mixing up things, like primary forces and conservation of energy. Magnetism decreases in a magnet due to the alingment of its atoms/molecules. If you rearrange them in their original position, you will increase the magnetic field.

Gravity, like the other three primary forces, does not fade with time.

You are absolutely right to say that gravity's action is infinite, but it decreases by the square of the distance between two objects. Therefore, very far away objects have pratically no more effect on us (this is where we say that it becomes negligeable).

Cheers
 
Learnphysics said:
A permanent magnet seems to lose its magnetism slowly as it does work on other objects. (conservation of energy)

No no no! This is not right. Conservation of energy does not mean that the magnet's force somehow gets "used up." What it does mean is that the changes in position (distance from the magnet) and velocity of the "other object" can be tracked as trading off potential energy for kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K