Does Light Obey the Same Rules as Matter in Motion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dayalanand roy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether light obeys the same rules as matter in motion, particularly focusing on the concepts of inertia, velocity addition, and the behavior of light in a moving reference frame. Participants examine scenarios involving light emitted from a moving train and the implications for its speed and direction relative to observers both inside and outside the train.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a light pulse emitted from a moving train experiences velocity addition, suggesting that it should maintain a constant speed regardless of the train's motion.
  • Another participant asserts that the speed of light remains constant and does not follow the same velocity addition rules as objects with mass, referencing relativistic velocity addition.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of inertia in relation to light, with one stating that a single pulse of light has energy and momentum but not mass, while a system of multiple light pulses can exhibit mass under certain conditions.
  • Questions arise regarding the behavior of a photon shot upwards in the moving train, with responses indicating that its direction will appear altered to an observer on the ground, but not to someone inside the train.
  • One participant introduces the concept of stellar aberration, explaining that the direction of light propagation is affected by the motion of the observer, particularly in astronomical contexts.
  • A technical discussion ensues about how multiple photons can have mass, involving equations that relate energy, momentum, and mass, with some participants seeking clarification on these relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of light in relation to motion and inertia, with no consensus reached on whether light behaves like matter in motion. The discussion includes both supportive and opposing viewpoints regarding the implications of light's properties and behavior in various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific definitions of mass and energy, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical relationships regarding the mass of systems of photons. The implications of relativistic effects and the conditions under which light behaves differently from matter are also noted but not fully resolved.

dayalanand roy
Messages
109
Reaction score
5
Does light have inertia?
Suppose a light pulse is emitted in a moving train in the direction of train’s movement. Should it move at its constant speed even in the moving train? And if there is a front window in the path of the light pulse, should it shoot out through the window to go ahead of the train and leave the train to lag behind? When we walk in the train in the direction of train’s movement, to an observer on the ground, our velocity will be added to train’s velocity. But should this be the case with the light pulse which will never show zero velocity in the train even to an observer aboard the train, and hence, should its velocity be added to train’s velocity to an observer on the ground. Now suppose that the train is moving at a speed much faster than light. The passengers sitting inside will also be moving at faster than light speed to observers on the ground. But should not the light pulse again travel at its own constant speed inside the train. Now if there is a rear window in the train, should the light pulse be, after some time, thrown back from the train through this window to lag behind the train, because it has little or no inertia? So, I want to know, whether the light pulse should face velocity addition problem or not? If it does not show velocity addition problem, can we use the speed of light as a reference for time? If we can, will it not lead us back to the absoluteness of time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dayalanand roy said:
Suppose a light pulse is emitted in a moving train in the direction of train’s movement. Should it move at its constant speed even in the moving train?

Yes.

And if there is a front window in the path of the light pulse, should it shoot out through the window to go ahead of the train and leave the train to lag behind?

Yes.

When we walk in the train in the direction of train’s movement, to an observer on the ground, our velocity will be added to train’s velocity.

Not in the way you're probably thinking. Look up "relativistic velocity addition", for example here:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/%E2%80%8Chbase/relativ/einvel.html

For everyday speeds, the result is very very close to simple addition. When the speeds are a significant fraction of c, the result is significantly different from simple addition.

But should this be the case with the light pulse

The formula described at the link above, also works with light, but it always gives c for the velocity of the light pulse, no matter what speed (less than c) you try to "add" it to.

Now suppose that the train is moving at a speed much faster than light.

Sorry, no can do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dayalanand roy said:
Does light have inertia?
A single pulse of light has energy and momentum, but not mass. A system of multiple pulses of light can have mass also. So I would say yes.
 
Many thanks for the reply.
Regards
 
Thanks for the reply.
regards
 
What if I shoot a photon upwards in that train? Will the direction of the photon be altered by the speed of the train?
 
smyth said:
What if I shoot a photon upwards in that train? Will the direction of the photon be altered by the speed of the train?

Relative to a person on the ground yes. Relative to you, no.
 
smyth said:
What if I shoot a photon upwards in that train? Will the direction of the photon be altered by the speed of the train?

Yes, that change of the direction of propagation of light is called stellar aberration and must be taken into account by precise astronomical observations due to the motion of the Earth around the sun.
 
Last edited:
DaleSpam said:
A single pulse of light has energy and momentum, but not mass. A system of multiple pulses of light can have mass also. So I would say yes.

Can you explain how multiple pulses of light can have mass?
 
  • #10
AdrianLuther said:
Can you explain how multiple pulses of light can have mass?

The energy and momentum of the photon are related via E=pc.
The mass of a system of particles satisfies the relationship: (Mc^2)^2=E^2-(\vec{p}c)^2.
1. For one photon, the above becomes: (Mc^2)^2=(pc)^2-(\vec{p}c)^2=0
2. For two photons with identical momenta: (Mc^2)^2=(2pc)^2-(2\vec{p}c)^2=0

But...

3. For two photons with opposing momenta: (Mc^2)^2=(2pc)^2-(0)^2=(2pc)^2 \ne 0

The above generalizes to the case of multiple photons:

(Mc^2)^2=(\Sigma{pc})^2-(c \Sigma{\vec{p}})^2=c^2((\Sigma{p})^2-(\Sigma{\vec{p}})^2)

In general, (\Sigma{p})^2 \ne (\Sigma{\vec{p}})^2 so, M>0.

PS: It is easy to prove that (\Sigma{p})^2 \ge (\Sigma{\vec{p}})^2
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
8K