Does Michael Spivak's Calculus explain why x²sin(1/x) < ε when ε > 1?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Buri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spivak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Michael Spivak's treatment of the limit involving the function x²sin(1/x) and its behavior as ε varies. Participants clarify that for ε > 1, the condition |x| < ε is insufficient, as x² can exceed ε when x is large. The argument hinges on the relationship |sin(1/x)| < |1/x| for |x| > 1, ensuring |x²sin(1/x)| remains bounded. Ultimately, the consensus is that Spivak's approach is limited by the lack of formal introduction to the sine function, necessitating a more refined estimate for ε > 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and continuity in calculus
  • Familiarity with the sine function and its properties
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions in calculus
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about the properties of the sine function, particularly |sin(x)| ≤ |x|
  • Explore advanced limit techniques involving oscillatory functions
  • Review Spivak's Calculus, focusing on the sections discussing limits and continuity
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching limit concepts, and mathematicians interested in the nuances of function behavior as ε varies.

Buri
Messages
271
Reaction score
0
Is Michael Spivak Wrong!?

My text says,

In general, if ε > 0, to ensure that

|x²sin(1/x)| < ε,

we need only require that

|x| < ε and x ≠ 0, provided that ε ≤ 1. If we are given an ε which is greater than 1 (it might be, even thought it is "small" ε's which are of interest), then it does not suffice to require that |x| < ε, but it certainly suffices to require that |x| < 1 and x ≠ 0.

I don't see why if ε > 1 then it doesn't work. I've tried finding a counter example, but it always seem to work. Can someone please help me out?

EDIT:

x²sin(1/x) ≈ x when x → ∞ so it would seem that when x isn't very large then x²sin(1/x) will always be less then x and hence less then ε, even if ε were greater than 1.

ANY HELP?? Please?

BTW, this is Calculus by Spivak page 92-93.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try x = 6/pi.

Then sin(1/x) = 1/2, so x^2\sin(1/x)=18/\pi^2.

The reason why it doesn't necessarily work when x&gt;1 is that we may have |x^2| &gt; \epsilon so we need sin to be suifficiently small, but x^2 grows towards infinity much faster than sin(1/x) grows towards 0.

It is true that we could still works with values of epsilon a little above 1, but we would need a different argument then.
 


So what would be wrong with this proof then?

sin x < x for x > 0, so then
|sin x| < |x| for x ≠ 0, so in particular we have

|sin x| < |x| for nonzero x in the interval (-1,1)

This means that

|sin(1/x)| < |1/x| for |x| > 1

which implies

|x^2 sin(1/x)| < |x| for |x| > 1

This should guarantee then that if ε > 1 and 1 < |x| < ε, then
|x^2 sin(1/x)| < |x| < ε
 


Yes, you are totally correct.

In fact, for all x in R, we have |x^2 sin(1/x)|<=|x|, so we can take delta=epsilon.

I think what Spivak meant, was that in this chapter you know almost nothing about the sine function. He only uses the very rough estimate |sin x|<= 1 for all x, which everyone knows and which is clear from the picture of the unit circle. If you want to extend the argument for epsilon >1, you will have to come up with a better estimate of |sin x| (or |sin(1/x)|): for example you are using the inequality
|sin x|<=|x|. I think Spivak does not want to assume you to know this fact, because the sine has not been introduced formally.
 


I'm confused now. Landau, you're telling me I'm right, but rasmhop has provided the counter-example x = 6/&pi;. So I'm massively confused now...
 


Buri said:
but rasmhop has provided the counter-example x = 6/&pi;.

That isn't really a counterexample I responded too hastily. Taking x=6/\pi we get:
x^2\sin(1/x) &gt; 1
but obviously not
x^2\sin(1/x) &gt; x
(for instance by the argument you provided). So my counterexample doesn't work.
 


Wait a second, x = 6/&pi; doesn't work! lol
 


Well thanks for helping me guys, this had been bothering me lol So thanks a lot for the help!
 


Yes, you were right. You're welcome :)
 
  • #10


|sin(\frac{1}{x})|&lt;\frac{1}{x} (since |sin(x)|<|x|) so it's certainly always true that |x^2sin(\frac{1}{x})|&lt;|x|

It might be that the way he proves it is far more convenient to assume that x is small, since a proof of sin(x)<x is non-trivial from first principles
 
  • #11


interesting...
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K