Does nature actually abhor anything?

  • Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date
3,073
3
Knot theory (and its applications): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_theory" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3,073
3
Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_knot_theory" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1,927
0
Spontaneity is, however, by definition natural.
It depends on the context. Quanta are evidently stochastic and random and we might describe such behavior as "spontaneous", but argue that it does not obey natural law. If you want you could even define such behavior as "supernatural" for being above or beyond natural law. At any rate, to define something random as a "law" is a contradiction.
 
195
1
According to the Law of Entropy, nature abhors a vacuum (sorry about your wife, turbo), and is busy filling space in, albeit restrained by those reticular structures in the universe that I've heard about but really know nothing about.
 
6,171
1,273
There's a saying that nature abhors a straight line.
There's no such saying. You are mixing two separate sayings together: 1.) "There are no straight lines in Nature", and 2.) "Nature abhors a vacuum".
 

Pythagorean

Gold Member
4,132
251
Nature abhors a change in flux
 
456
8
Nature abhors giving away free stuff." There ain't no such thing as a free lunch".
 

Related Threads for: Does nature actually abhor anything?

  • Posted
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Posted
2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
Replies
39
Views
18K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
309
Views
69K
Replies
18
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top