Does nature actually abhor anything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of whether nature abhors straight lines and knots, referencing the idea that while crystals exhibit straight lines, they may not be perfectly straight upon closer inspection. Participants debate the existence of knots in nature, with examples like climbing plants and vines being mentioned. The conversation shifts to the notion of ritual in nature, contrasting it with spontaneity, and discussing how rituals are seen as artificial compared to natural phenomena. The dialogue also touches on the definitions of nature and spontaneity, suggesting that while nature may exhibit randomness, it is fundamentally spontaneous. Additionally, the conversation clarifies common sayings about nature, distinguishing between the ideas that "nature abhors a vacuum" and "there are no straight lines in nature." Overall, the thread delves into philosophical interpretations of natural phenomena and the definitions surrounding them.
  • #31
moejoe15 said:
There's a saying that nature abhors a straight line.
There's no such saying. You are mixing two separate sayings together: 1.) "There are no straight lines in Nature", and 2.) "Nature abhors a vacuum".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Nature abhors a change in flux
 
  • #33
Nature abhors giving away free stuff." There ain't no such thing as a free lunch".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
358
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K