Does Relativistic effect applies to light as well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikeadidas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Relativistic
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relativistic effects on light, particularly the concept of length contraction as perceived by a traveler moving at high speeds. It clarifies that while a traveler experiences length contraction, light, traveling at speed c, would theoretically have zero distance and time from its own perspective, which is not a usable frame of reference. The conversation emphasizes that no object can reach light speed, making the concept of contraction at that speed infinite and impractical. Approaching light speed does result in significant time dilation, leading to the perception of instant travel. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the nature of relativity and the behavior of light.
nikeadidas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A quick question..a traveller will observe length of his journey contracted if he is traveling in a straight line..thus when light travels, doesn't the distance it travels get contracted?..and since light itself travels at c, ideally the contraction factor should be zero, so light should reach instantly..I am not sure what am I missing..please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If an "observer" were able to travel at the speed of light, distances would be reduced to 0. Further, time would reduced to a standstill. In other words, the is NO usable "frame of reference" at light speed.
 
You surely mean that the contraction factor should be infinite (resulting in zero length).

The equations refer to reference systems and no reference system can reach the speed of light - and infinites would not be very useful. But if one could closely approach the speed of light, indeed one would be at one's destiny "in no time" or instantly. So, perhaps there is nothing that you missed, and you discovered the concept of "time dilation". :smile:

Einstein phrased it as follows:

"For v=c all moving objects—viewed from the “stationary” system—shrivel up into plane figures. [..] we shall [..] find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."
and
"the time marked by the clock (viewed in the stationary system) is slow by 1-sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} seconds per second".
- http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Note: it could be that there's a thingy with your formulation "get contracted": you should have written "appears to be contracted for the light". It's essential to keep track of who/which system (although light isn't either) measures what and when!
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K