Does Relativistic Motion Impact Quantum Optical Experiments?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the impact of relativistic motion on quantum optical experiments, specifically regarding photon emitters and detectors moving at various velocities. It highlights the significance of the rest frames of emitters and detectors, particularly in experiments like the Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) experiment. The conversation emphasizes that while traditional quantum optics assumes stationary emitters and detectors, relativistic effects such as Doppler shifts can alter the wavelengths of detected photons, potentially allowing for the observation of the HOM effect under certain conditions. The feasibility of applying standard quantum optics principles while accounting for these relativistic effects is also questioned.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum optics principles, particularly the Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment.
  • Familiarity with relativistic motion and its effects on photon behavior.
  • Knowledge of Doppler shifts and their implications in wave phenomena.
  • Basic concepts of entangled photons and their detection mechanisms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of relativistic quantum mechanics.
  • Explore advanced quantum optics techniques involving moving detectors.
  • Study the implications of Doppler shifts in quantum experiments.
  • Investigate experimental setups that successfully demonstrate relativistic effects in quantum optics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum optics researchers, and experimentalists interested in the intersection of relativistic motion and quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring advanced photon detection methods.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
799
If we are considering a problem involving generic photon emitters and detectors that are moving at various relativistic velocities with respect to each other, do we need to move outside of non-relativistic quantum optics?

I'd like to stress that this question is not about any definite species or flavor of massive particles moving at relativistic velocities. (That would, IIUC, take us into QFT). But I'm asking here about generic photon emission events and photon detection events where the rest frames of the emitters and detectors are different. The detectors interact only with propagating free photons, and no massive entities interact directly with each other.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you specify more about the problem? Obviously if what you're measuring has a lot to do with the time things occur it will have a big impact, but there are a lot of other ways it could change things, it just depends on what you're looking for.
 
For example, take a Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment. In the usual version, of course the emitter and the detectors are all in the same rest frame, and the source emits photons at the same wavelength.

But let's consider two entangled photons emitted at different wavelengths. (I believe this happens in SPD if the alignment is chosen in a certain way). In the rest frame of the emitter and apparatus, the detectors will receive photons at different wavelengths, so the usual interference will not occur. But if the one detector is moving towards the beam splitter and the other is moving away from it, then the Doppler shifted wavelengths will match. And as it happens, the path lengths after leaving the splitter don't have to be equal anyway. So, would we see the HOM effect, at least in principle? (Of course, I understand that it is difficult enough, in practice, to make it work in a lab --- so it would be that much harder with moving apparatus).

But to get back to my question -- in principle, can we analyze this correctly, merely by applying the correct Doppler shifts and then following the usual quantum optics route?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
873
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K