Does series converge or Diverge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bengaltiger14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence or divergence of the series defined by the expression ((2^n)/((n+1)!)) with the summation limits from n=0 to infinity. Participants are analyzing the application of the Ratio Test in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the Ratio Test by substituting n with n+1 and simplifying the resulting expressions. There are questions regarding the correctness of these substitutions and simplifications, particularly about how factorials and powers are handled.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct simplification steps, while others express confusion about the factorial manipulation involved in the Ratio Test. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the substitutions made.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the extent of guidance provided. There is a focus on ensuring that all steps in the mathematical reasoning are clearly understood and correctly applied.

bengaltiger14
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Does series converge or Diverge?

Homework Statement


((2^n)/((n+1)!)) Bottom of Summation: n=0, top is infinity


The Attempt at a Solution



Replacing the n's with n+1, then inverting and multiplying the following:

((2^n * 2) / ((n+1)+1)n!)) * ((n+1) * n! ) / 2^n


I got 2, with is greater than 1, so it diverges according to the Ratio Test.
Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Incorrect, it should be 0.

"((n+1)+1)n!))" should be (n+2)(n+1)*n! - which cancels with the (n+1)*n!, leaving 2/(n+2)
 
Thanks Proton. That makes sense. I did not even think to add the two 1's together.
 
Well. Just writing it out on paper and it does not make sense to me what you said Proton. Why would ((n+1)+1)n! equat (n+2)(n+1) * n!?? It seems that if anything it would be just (n+2)*n!

Then the result would be (2n+1)/n+2
 
2^(n+1)/2^n=2. ((n+1)+1)!/(n+1)!=(n+2)!/(n+1)!=(n+2)*(n+1)!/(n+1)!=n+2.
So the total ratio is 2/(n+2)->0 as Proton said.
 
Could you step me through this. It is just not making any sense.

after substituting n+1 for all n's, I have:
(2^n * 2)/((n+1)+1)n!)

This equation to be multiplied by ((n+1)n!)/2^n

I understand getting (n+2)n! after added the two ones together. Just don't see where that second n+1 comes from
 
Concentrate on substituting n->n+1 in (n+1)*n!. The first factor changes to (n+2) (I think you are ok on that) but the second factor needs to change to (n+1)! since it contains n and n should be changed to n+1. So the result is (n+1)n! -> (n+2)(n+1)!. Now split (n+1)!=(n+1)*n!.
 
Ok... i understand. I was not substituting the n+1 into the n!. I was cancelling the two n!'s. Thanks for your help. I understand now. Just simply overlooking that step.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K