Does Taking a Step Forward Affect Age Difference in Time Dilation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of time dilation in relativity, specifically addressing whether taking a step forward affects the age difference between two individuals, Steve and John, who are one year apart in age. It concludes that their chronological ages remain unchanged as defined by the time elapsed since their births, regardless of movement. However, if both carried highly precise clocks, the difference in their recorded times would slightly decrease after one steps forward, illustrating the effects of time dilation as described in the twin paradox.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with time dilation and the twin paradox
  • Knowledge of proper time and worldlines in physics
  • Experience with precise timekeeping methods, such as atomic clocks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the twin paradox in detail
  • Explore the principles of time dilation in special relativity
  • Learn about the operation and accuracy of atomic clocks
  • Investigate the implications of proper time in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of time dilation on age and movement.

Seinfeld
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just started learning about relativity and time dilation last night. It's extremely interesting, and I have a quick question.

Suppose two people (Steve and John) and standing side by side. Steve is *exactly* 1 year older than John. If either one of them takes a step forward, and the other remains stationary, has the gap between their ages changed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seinfeld said:
Suppose two people (Steve and John) and standing side by side. Steve is *exactly* 1 year older than John. If either one of them takes a step forward, and the other remains stationary, has the gap between their ages changed?

No. Their "age" is defined as the amount of time since their birth, as recorded on their birth certificates. The way you determine this is by finding the number of days, hours, and minutes between the current date and time from the date and time recorded on the birth certificate. Steve and John would probably find out the time from their cellphone, or a website that reports an atomic clock time. After doing these calculations Steve would find that he was still *exactly* one year older than John.
 
Crosson said:
No. Their "age" is defined as the amount of time since their birth, as recorded on their birth certificates. The way you determine this is by finding the number of days, hours, and minutes between the current date and time from the date and time recorded on the birth certificate. Steve and John would probably find out the time from their cellphone, or a website that reports an atomic clock time. After doing these calculations Steve would find that he was still *exactly* one year older than John.
This seems like semantics, but in the twin paradox it's generally assumed that "age" would be the amount of time elapsed since birth on a clock which was carried along by the person (the amount of proper time on their worldline). Certainly it would be kind of weird to say two twins are the "same age" if one has only lived a subjective time of 30 years and has the body of a 30-year-old, while the other has lived a subjective time of 80 years and has the body of an 80-year-old.

Anyway, the physical answer to the question is that if both people had been carrying ridiculously precise clocks (I suspect they'd have to be many times more precise than modern atomic clocks) with them since birth, and before taking the step Steve's clock was precisely 1 year ahead of John's, than after taking the step Steve's clock will be very slightly less than 1 year ahead of John's by some extremely tiny amount.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
984
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K