Does the bond between atoms affect Thermal Expansion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the thermal expansion coefficients (TEC) of cobalt-based and manganite-based perovskite cathodes, specifically La0.3Sr0.7CoO3-x and La0.65Sr0.3MnO3-x. The cobalt-based cathode exhibits a TEC of approximately 20x10-6K-1, while the manganite-based cathode shows a TEC of around 10x10-6K-1. This difference is attributed to the weaker Co-O bond compared to the Mn-O bond, which enhances ionic conduction due to increased oxygen ion mobility. Additionally, the structural differences in the perovskite ABO3 framework, where A and B represent different cation sizes, may further influence oxygen ion mobility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perovskite structures, specifically ABO3 configurations.
  • Knowledge of thermal expansion coefficients (TEC) in materials science.
  • Familiarity with ionic conduction mechanisms in solid-state materials.
  • Basic concepts of bond strength and its effects on material properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of bond strength on ionic mobility in solid-state electrolytes.
  • Explore the role of cation size in perovskite structures and its impact on ionic conduction.
  • Investigate the thermal expansion properties of other perovskite materials.
  • Learn about advanced characterization techniques for measuring TEC in materials.
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, chemists, and engineers interested in the thermal properties and ionic conduction of perovskite materials, particularly in energy applications such as fuel cells and batteries.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


From a journal I read that the cobalt-based perovskite cathode usually has better ionic and electrical conduction but higher TEC compare to Maganite-based perovskite cathode. Because of the Co-O bond is weaker than Mn-O bond.

e.g.
Cobalt-based perovskite cathode, La0.3Sr0.7CoO3-x has thermal expansion coefficient(TEC) at around 20x10-6K-1 while La0.65Sr0.3MnO3-x with TEC around 10 x10-6K-1
...probably this is not a very good comparison because the La to Sr ratio is a little bit different...

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because of the weaker bond of Co-O bond, the mobility of Oxygen ion increase thus better ionic conduction; And the Co-O make further distance because of weaker bonding force when heat is apply causing high TEC value.

...extra question...sorry can't change the thread tittle...
And i did read somewhere before about the peroskite structure, ABO3, where A is the larger atoms at 8 corner of the unit cell and B is the smaller cation at the center of the unit cell, and if A is much larger than B in radius, the gap in the unit cell is bigger so the oxygen ion can move through the gap easier. I found that Mn and Co is in same row in period table, just Co has 2 extra electron and proton compare to Mn so its size is smaller...probably not much smaller, but does this size difference affect the mobility of oxygen ion too?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K