B Does the Earth's Mass Change Due to Biological Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Althepump
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Mass
Click For Summary
Biological processes, such as plant growth and animal waste, do not significantly change the Earth's mass, as these processes are largely mass-neutral; the mass of living organisms is part of the Earth's total mass. The primary source of mass change is the accretion of space debris, estimated at about 60 tons per day, which is negligible compared to the Earth's total mass. Even if all living matter on Earth were burned, the mass change would still be minimal and irrelevant in the grand scheme. The Earth's orbit around the sun is dominated by the sun's mass, meaning any changes in Earth's mass would have a negligible effect on its orbit. Overall, the mass of the Earth can be considered constant for practical calculations.
  • #31
Althepump said:
Cutter Ketch,

Yesterday you brought up an interesting point. Mass convert to Energy. But this morning I ask myself " if it's true, why not the Earth convert to energy as well?
As others have said, mass-energy equivalence is a drop in the bucket -- irrelevant for this purpose.

What do you mean by "earth convert to energy"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Mass cannot suddenly disappear. Chemical and nuclear reactions release a tiny fraction of the mass of the involved atoms as energy. Most of the possible reactions happened in the past already.
 
  • #33
Bystander said:
"Does Earth mass get heavier?"
"Heavier" implies "weight," or force. Should we examine the implication? Given that the sun is losing mass at 1.5 million tons per second, the Earth should be losing "weight."

what is your reasoning there ??
 
  • #34
davenn said:
what is your reasoning there ??
Less attractive force between the Earth and the sun.
 
  • #35
Bystander said:
Less attractive force between the Earth and the sun.
Ah. I see what he did there.

The Earth's weight is determined by the Sun's gravity. Sun's mass is shrinking, so Earth's weight is shrinking
 
  • #36
DaveC426913 said:
Ah. I see what he did there.

The Earth's weight is determined by the Sun's gravity. Sun's mass is shrinking, so Earth's weight is shrinking
But since the Earth is following a free-fall trajectory, it is technically weightless.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #37
Janus said:
a free-fall trajectory,
An expanding/growing free-fall trajectory; i.e., the force exerted by the sun is decreasing, so, technically less than weightless.
 
  • Like
Likes Cutter Ketch
  • #38
Bystander said:
An expanding/growing free-fall trajectory; i.e., the force exerted by the sun is decreasing, so, technically less than weightless.

Oohhh! I like that. It's drifting up. It must be less than weightless! Ok, I don't think that's going in the textbooks anytime soon, but it's funny.
 
  • #39
Bystander said:
Less attractive force between the Earth and the sun.

DaveC426913 said:
The Earth's weight is determined by the Sun's gravity. Sun's mass is shrinking, so Earth's weight is shrinking

That mite affect the weight of the Earth but it doesn't affect the mass of the earth

and since the OP is talking about the MASS of the Earth ... it's weight in any gravity field is irrelevant
particularly in an orbit

hence Janus's response
Janus said:
But since the Earth is following a free-fall trajectory, it is technically weightless.
 
  • #40
As per my knowledge, having more people or trees doesn't add any mass to the planet. Humans and things are done with the matter that is already on the planet. It's just been transformed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
108
Views
20K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K