Does the Harmonic Series Exceed Its Integral Counterpart?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathworker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison between the harmonic series and its integral counterpart, specifically whether the harmonic series exceeds the integral of the function \( \frac{1}{x} \) from 1 to infinity. Participants explore the implications of divergence for both the series and the integral, as well as the validity of using graphical representations to illustrate these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that comparing the harmonic series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n} \) to the integral \( \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x} dx \) is meaningful, particularly in the context of demonstrating divergence.
  • Others argue that both the harmonic series and the integral diverge, making direct comparison problematic.
  • One participant suggests that the harmonic series can be shown to diverge through a comparison with a divergent series, using a specific summation technique.
  • There is a discussion about the graphical representation of the series and integral, with some questioning the use of bars in the graph to illustrate the relationship between the two.
  • Another participant references historical contributions to the understanding of the harmonic series and its divergence, mentioning Euler and d'Oresme.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of comparing the harmonic series and its integral. While some support the comparison as a means to demonstrate divergence, others highlight the complications arising from both expressions diverging. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these comparisons.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integral's evaluation limits and the nature of the functions involved introduce complexities that affect the comparison. The divergence of both the series and the integral is acknowledged, but the implications of this divergence are debated.

mathworker
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Is it true that,
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}>\int_{1}^{\infty}$$$$\frac {1}{x}dx$$
explanation is appreciated :)
edit:sorry,lower limit in right hand side is changed from "0" to "1"
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: series integral comparision

mathworker said:
Is it true that,
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}>\int_{0}^{\infty}$$$$\frac {1}{x}dx$$
explanation is appreciated :)

No it's not. Your sum is the right-hand estimate for the definite integral, but since the function is decreasing, your sum is an UNDER-estimate.
 
Re: series integral comparision

mathworker said:
Is it true that,
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}>\int_{0}^{\infty}$$$$\frac {1}{x}dx$$
explanation is appreciated :)

The expressions $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}$ and$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x}\ dx$ are meaningless because both the series and the integral diverge... may be is true that...

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} > \int_{1}^{n+1} \frac{dx}{x}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: series integral comparision

mathworker said:
Is it true that,
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}>\int_{1}^{\infty}$$$$\frac {1}{x}dx$$
explanation is appreciated :)
edit:sorry,lower limit in right hand side is changed from "0" to "1"

I suspect that the OP is trying to prove that [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{n}} \end{align*}[/math] is divergent. To do this, a simple comparison can be used.

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{n}} &= \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} + \frac{1}{8} + \dots \\ &> \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \left( \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} \right) + \dots \\ &= \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \dots \\ \to \infty \end{align*}[/math]

Since the harmonic series is greater than this divergent series, the harmonic series is divergent.
 
Re: series integral comparision

Yeah its meaning less to to compare two infinities, see 10.4 in this author trying two make some sense by comparing area under graphs,is the author wrong doing so?
 
No, the author is not wrong to do so. You have interpreted the original integral incorrectly. In this case the author is using the sum as a LEFT endpoint estimate on the integral, as on a decreasing function, you have an OVER estimation. The integral is actually being evaluated between 1 and infinity, not 0 and infinity. So the sum IS greater than the integral in that region, and so can be used to show the divergence of this series.
 
Actually my question is why did the author use bars for in graph
 
mathworker said:
Actually my question is why did the author use bars for in graph

The task of the author probably is to demonstrate by geometrical evidence that... $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} > \int_{1}^{n+1} \frac{d x}{x} = \ln (n+1)\ (1)$

But if (1) is true, what can we say about the asyntotical behavior of $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k}$ and $\displaystyle \ln n$?... in the XVIII century the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler demonstrated that...$\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} - \ln n = \gamma\ (2)$

... where $\displaystyle \gamma= .5772...$ is the so called 'Euler's constant'... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
mathworker said:
Actually my question is why did the author use bars for in graph

Because each bar has an area that is numerically equal to each term in the sum...
 
  • #10
Re: series integral comparision

Prove It said:
I suspect that the OP is trying to prove that [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{n}} \end{align*}[/math] is divergent. To do this, a simple comparison can be used.

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{n}} &= \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} + \frac{1}{8} + \dots \\ &> \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \left( \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} \right) + \dots \\ &= \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \dots \\ \to \infty \end{align*}[/math]

Since the harmonic series is greater than this divergent series, the harmonic series is divergent.

Very elegant! I'll have to remember this one.
 
  • #11
Re: series integral comparision

Ackbach said:
Very elegant! I'll have to remember this one.

This 'very elegant' prove that the harmonic series diverges was found in the 14th century by the French mathematician, economist, phisician, astronomer, astrologist, philosoph and theologian Nicolas d'Oresme, bishop of Lisieaux, one of the most original a versatile minds of the Middle Age...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K