Does the Operation in Set Theory Imply a Singleton Set?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of set operations defined by specific axioms in abstract algebra, particularly in Herstein's "Abstract Algebra." The two axioms state that for any elements a and b in a set S, the operation * satisfies a*b = a and a*b = b*a. The conclusion drawn is that these axioms imply that the set S must be a singleton set, as all elements must equal each other. The participant expresses uncertainty about the sufficiency of this conclusion, suggesting a proof by contradiction to validate the axioms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and operations
  • Familiarity with abstract algebra concepts
  • Knowledge of axiomatic structures in mathematics
  • Basic proof techniques, including proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of operations in abstract algebra, focusing on identity and commutativity
  • Learn about proof techniques in mathematics, especially proof by contradiction
  • Explore the implications of singleton sets in set theory
  • Review Herstein's "Abstract Algebra" for deeper insights into axiomatic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians exploring set theory, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of mathematical operations.

set
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let S be a set with an operation * which assigns an element a*b of S for any a,b in S. Let us assume that the following two rules hold:
1. If a, b are any objects in S, then a*b = a
2. If a, b are any objects in S, then a*b = b*a
(Herstein, Abstract Algebra, 2ed)


Homework Equations


Is it safe to assume that the symmetry, transitivity, and reflexibility hold?


The Attempt at a Solution


a = a*b = b*a = b
But I am not sure if this is sufficient as it is my first course (in fact, first problem!) in abstract algebra...
[Edit]
Or with the relation obtained from the axioms of S, shall I proceed with proof by contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a = a*b = b*a = b
This is true for all a,b in S, and shows that S just has one single element. That is a strange problem.
The validity of those axioms will follow from that, but where is the point?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K