Does the Sequence Converge?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contradiction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by the recurrence relation \( a_{n+1} = \frac{a}{a_n} \) with \( a > 1 \) and \( a_0 < 1 \) does not converge. Assuming convergence leads to a contradiction, as the limit \( l \) must satisfy \( l^2 = a > 1 \), which contradicts the initial condition \( a_0 < 1 \). The sequence oscillates between two values, \( a_0 \) and \( \frac{a}{a_0} \), and converges only if \( a_0 = -\sqrt{a} \), which is outside the defined range for \( a_0 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recurrence relations
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs and contradictions
  • Basic algebra involving square roots and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of oscillating sequences in mathematical analysis
  • Learn about convergence criteria for sequences
  • Explore counterexamples in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions on sequence behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in the behavior of sequences and convergence criteria.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence that satisfies the relations $a_{n+1}=\frac{a}{a_n}$, where $a>1$, and $a_0<1$. I want to show that the sequence does not converge.

I have thought to suppose that the sequence does converge. Then $a_n \to l<+\infty$.
Then we get that $l=\frac{a}{l} \Rightarrow l^2=a>1$.
Also $a_1=\frac{a}{a_0}>a>1$.

But I don't see how we get a contradiction. Could you give me a hint? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence that satisfies the relations $a_{n+1}=\frac{a}{a_n}$, where $a>1$, and $a_0<1$. I want to show that the sequence does not converge.

I have thought to suppose that the sequence does converge. Then $a_n \to l<+\infty$.
Then we get that $l=\frac{a}{l} \Rightarrow l^2=a>1$.
Also $a_1=\frac{a}{a_0}>a>1$.

But I don't see how we get a contradiction. Could you give me a hint? (Thinking)
We have:
$$ \begin{aligned}
a_{n+1} &= \frac{a}{a_n}\\
a_{n+2} &= \frac{a}{a_{n+1}} = a_n
\end{aligned}$$

and the sequence looks like ${x,y,x,y,\dots}$.
 
castor28 said:
We have:
$$ \begin{aligned}
a_{n+1} &= \frac{a}{a_n}\\
a_{n+2} &= \frac{a}{a_{n+1}} = a_n
\end{aligned}$$

and the sequence looks like ${x,y,x,y,\dots}$.

Ah I see... But how do we justify it formally?

Do we suppose that $a_n \to l<+\infty$ ?

If so, then we have that $a_{n+1} \to l$ and $a_{n+2} \to l$.
The second relation holds. The first relation gives us that $\frac{a}{a_n} \to l$ and this implies that $\frac{a}{l}=l \Rightarrow a=l^2$. But this holds, or not? (Thinking)

How else can we justify it?
 
A sequence of the form x, y, x, y, ... has two subsequences, one that converges to x and one that converges to y. The sequence itself converges if and only if x= y. Here, You have [math]a_1= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math], [math]a_2= \frac{a}{a_1}= \frac{a}{1}\frac{a_0}{a}= a_0[/math], [math]a_3= \frac{a}{a_2}= \frac{a}{1}\frac{1}{a_0}= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math], etc. That is, [math]x= a_0[/math] and [math]y= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math]. This sequence converges if and only if [math]a_0= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math] or [math]a= a_0^2[/math]. Since we are told that [math]a< 0[/math] that is a contradiction.
 
Of course, we may also cheat a little. The question does not say that $a_0\ge 0$, only that $a_0<1$. If we take $a_0=-\sqrt{a}$, the sequence is constant and therefore convergent.:)
 
castor28 said:
Of course, we may also cheat a little. The question does not say that $a_0\ge 0$, only that $a_0<1$. If we take $a_0=-\sqrt{a}$, the sequence is constant and therefore convergent.:)

Cheating or not, doesn't it mathematically just mean that the statement is false?
And that you have given a counter example?
 
I like Serena said:
Cheating or not, doesn't it mathematically just mean that the statement is false?
And that you have given a counter example?

Well, we can say that the sequence does not always converge. If this was an exam question, I would answer that the sequence converges if and only if $a_0=-\sqrt{a}$.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A sequence of the form x, y, x, y, ... has two subsequences, one that converges to x and one that converges to y. The sequence itself converges if and only if x= y. Here, You have [math]a_1= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math], [math]a_2= \frac{a}{a_1}= \frac{a}{1}\frac{a_0}{a}= a_0[/math], [math]a_3= \frac{a}{a_2}= \frac{a}{1}\frac{1}{a_0}= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math], etc. That is, [math]x= a_0[/math] and [math]y= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math]. This sequence converges if and only if [math]a_0= \frac{a}{a_0}[/math] or [math]a= a_0^2[/math]. Since we are told that [math]a< 0[/math] that is a contradiction.

Ah I see... Thank you! (Smile)

- - - Updated - - -

castor28 said:
Of course, we may also cheat a little. The question does not say that $a_0\ge 0$, only that $a_0<1$. If we take $a_0=-\sqrt{a}$, the sequence is constant and therefore convergent.:)

I like Serena said:
Cheating or not, doesn't it mathematically just mean that the statement is false?
And that you have given a counter example?

castor28 said:
Well, we can say that the sequence does not always converge. If this was an exam question, I would answer that the sequence converges if and only if $a_0=-\sqrt{a}$.

So the statement is just true, when we consider that $0 \leq \alpha_0<1$, right?
 
evinda said:
So the statement is just true, when we consider that $0 \leq \alpha_0<1$, right?

Yep. (Nod)
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Nod)

Nice, thank you! (Happy)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K