Does the series converge or diverge ( -1)^n (1-1/n)^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simkate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series ∑(n=200 to ∞) ( -1)^n (1-1/n)^n diverges. The evaluation of the limit L as n approaches infinity results in L = 1/e, which is not equal to zero, thus failing the second condition of the Alternating Series Convergence Test. The initial approach contained errors, particularly in variable substitution and limit evaluation. The correct application of L'Hôpital's Rule confirms that the series does not converge absolutely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Alternating Series Test
  • Familiarity with limits and L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and logarithms
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly limits involving infinity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Alternating Series Test in detail
  • Learn about L'Hôpital's Rule and its applications
  • Explore the behavior of limits involving exponential functions
  • Investigate convergence tests for series beyond the Alternating Series Test
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying series convergence, particularly in calculus or advanced mathematics courses.

Simkate
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I just want to know if what i did is correct...please help Thank YOU!

∑(n =200 to ∞) ( -1)^n (1-1/n)^n = (-1 + 1/n)

This is a alternation Series

therefore the 2 condtions need to be satisfied for it to be Convergent.
i) is true

ii) lim b_n = 0 ?

L= lim (n--> ∞) (1-1/n)^n

= lim ( n--> 0^+) ln (1-t) / t = -1

= lim(n-->0^+) ln (-1/1/t) / (1) = -1

Thus, L=e^-1 = 1/e which not equal to O.

Therefore the series is not absolutely convergent and is divergent


AM I CORRECT?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simkate said:
ii) lim b_n = 0 ?

L= lim (n--> ∞) (1-1/n)^n

= lim ( n--> 0^+) ln (1-t) / t = -1

= lim(n-->0^+) ln (-1/1/t) / (1) = -1

Thus, L=e^-1 = 1/e which not equal to O.

Therefore the series is not absolutely convergent and is divergent


AM I CORRECT?
Yes and no. Your basic idea is correct, but what you wrote down needs a lot of work. For instance, the original limit is as n goes to infinity, but your expression suddenly has t in it and n is suddenly going to 0+. You need to say what substitution you're doing and use only one variable at a time. Next, you write the limit equals -1. How did you get that? And if you already have the answer, why did you do more steps to evaluate the limit after that? You also differentiated incorrectly and then claimed the limit of t as t->0+ is equal to -1. And where did the log come from? Are you really saying the limit of a function and the limit of the log of that function are equal?
 
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1-\frac{1}{n})^n = L

as n \rightarrow \infty, the expression tends to

(1-0)^{\infty} = 1 = L

What conclusions do you get when

L = 1,\ L \neq 0
 
Je m'appelle said:
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1-\frac{1}{n})^n = L

as n \rightarrow \infty, the expression tends to

(1-0)^{\infty} = 1 = L
That's not correct.
What conclusions do you get when

L = 1,\ L \neq 0
 
vela said:
That's not correct.

You're absolutely correct, pardon my mistake, I must have been way too distracted.

To the original poster, disregard my last post, the correct evaluation would have been:

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1-\frac{1}{n})^n = L

Let us consider the following

y = (1-\frac{1}{n})^n

Now let's apply the natural log on both sides to get to the following

ln(y) = n \ ln(1-\frac{1}{n})

As n \rightarrow \infty we have the following undefined expression

ln(y) = \infty . 0

At this point, we can use L'hôpital's at the right hand side of the equation, but first, we need to rewrite the expression in a fraction, in order to use L'hôpital's as follows

ln(y) = \frac{ln(1-\frac{1}{n})}{\frac{1}{n}}

Now we can use L'hôpital's

ln(y) = \frac{\frac{d}{dn}ln(1-\frac{1}{n})}{\frac{d}{dn}\frac{1}{n}}

To arrive at

ln(y) = -\frac{1}{(1-\frac{1}{n})}

Now we exponentiate both sides to get to

y = e^{-\frac{1}{(1-\frac{1}{n})}}

We can go back now to our original equation, substitute the new expression of y and evaluate the limit

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} y = L

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} e^{-\frac{1}{(1-\frac{1}{n})}} = L

e^{-1} = L, \ L = \frac{1}{e}

So as we found out that L \neq 0, the second condition for the Alternating Series Convergence Test is not satisfied and therefore the series diverges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K