Does This Proof Prove the Equation (a^{n})^{m}=a^{nm}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_skier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equation (a^n)^m = a^(nm) using mathematical induction. The initial attempt involves fixing a and n, then inducting on m, but some participants express concerns about the clarity and rigor of the inductive step. They emphasize the need to explicitly show that the relationship holds for m+1 by using the inductive hypothesis effectively. Suggestions include rearranging terms to demonstrate the equality and ensuring that the proof applies to integers. The conversation concludes with a participant feeling confident about their proof after incorporating feedback.
a_skier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove (a^{n})^{m}=a^{nm}

Homework Equations



Proof by induction
a^{n}*a=a^{n+1}
a^{n}*a^{m}=a^{nm}

The Attempt at a Solution



Let a and n be fixed. I will induct on m.

Suppose m=1. Then a^{(n)(m)}=a^{n(1)}=(a^{n})^{1}

Now assume the hypothesis is true for any integer m in P. I will show this is true for m+1.

a^{n(m+1)}=(a^{n})^{m+1}

Thus the hypothesis is true for m+1.

Is this proof sufficient? I am once again struck by a problem that seems almost too simple to be proved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your two equations in section 2 of your post seem fairly irrelevant to the problem at hand.

Your inductive step seems to have zero content. Why is
a^{n(m+1)} = \left( a^{n} \right)^{m+1}
true at all? The whole point is you're supposed to prove that using your inductive hypothesis. You need to use the fact that a^{nm} = \left(a^n\right)^m
at some point
 
Your induction will still only prove that the relationship is true for integer m and n if you succeed. Clearly the relationship is more general than that.
 
an(m+1)=an*(m+1)=(by the theorem) (an)(m+1)

How else could I move from the left side of the equality to the right? If someone could give me a little direction I would love to solve it myself.
 
Fightfish said:
Your induction will still only prove that the relationship is true for integer m and n if you succeed. Clearly the relationship is more general than that.

Luckily I only need to prove it for integers right now. I don't think I could handle anything more atm.
 
You need to show explicitly that the proposition is true for m+1 making use of the assumption that the proposition holds true for m, which you are clearly lacking here.
Start with (a^{n})^{(m+1)}, rearrange / rewrite it until you manage to obtain a term (a^{n})^{m} somewhere. Then you can replace that term with a^{nm}
 
a_skier said:
an(m+1)=an*(m+1)=(by the theorem) (an)(m+1)

How else could I move from the left side of the equality to the right? If someone could give me a little direction I would love to solve it myself.

Fightfish gives a good suggestion... alternatively from an*(m+1) do literally the only algebra you are allowed to do and re-write it as anm+n
 
Here's the proof for m=1

(an)m=(an)1=(By the definition)an

Now for m+1
Because xn+m=xn*xm

Let x=(an)

(x)(m+1)=(x)m*(x)1 and by the hypothesis and the case m=1 I have already proved and replacing x with (an)
(x)m*(x)1=(an)m*(an)1=anm*an=anm+n=an(m+1)

I'm pretty sure this proves it!? IM SO EXCITED THIS IS AWESOME HAHA!
 
Yeah that looks good to me
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K