Does Trying to Help Sometimes Make Things Worse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A coffee shop encounter led to a series of unexpected events when a man dashed out to avoid a parking ticket, prompting a customer to pay for his coffee as an act of kindness. However, the barista mistakenly charged the next customer, who was blind, leading to confusion and frustration. The initial customer ended up feeling awkward and poorer by $3.25, reflecting on the challenges of good deeds. The discussion then shifted to humorous anecdotes about food mishaps and the expectations of customers when vendors make mistakes. Participants shared experiences of poor service and the importance of customer retention, with some expressing disdain for Starbucks coffee. The thread concluded with light-hearted banter about good deeds and personal stories from the Navy, emphasizing the unpredictability of kindness and the humorous side of everyday mishaps.
  • #61
Most authority figures are actually middlemen. They are responsible for a group of people and responsible to an even higher authority figure. They have to worry about the needs of their workers, the demands of their boss, and their own personal needs as well. That's a lot of directions to be pulled in at once. I think it is especially important for them to question authority so they don't wind up OCPD like Hitsquad's link notes.

They could consider that while their secretary gets them a Mocha Latte.

Huck
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Moonbear said:
Questioning authority always seems so fun...until you ARE the authority. :-p
A doubled-edge sword indeed. The trick is to be your own manager and/or manage other people without the title. Of course a draw-back is that you don't get the pay either. :frown:
 
  • #63
Differences between disordered behavior and disordered personality

Huckleberry said:
I think it is especially important for them to question authority so they don't wind up OCPD like Hitsquad's link notes.
Adults don't wind up OCPD. Personality disorders (PDs) begin in youth and remain throughout life. This pervasive aspect of the rigid outlook and behavior pattern of PDs is one important difference between a personality disorder and a mere disorder. To be afflicted with a PD means to see yourself (self-image) and the world (view of others) for a lifetime in certain fundamental ways that are different from how non-PDs see themselves and the world.
http://www.toad.net/~arcturus/dd/pdsa.htm#2

  • An enduring pattern that deviates markedly from the person's culture [...]
  • The enduring pattern is inflexible and pervasive.
  • Onset is in adolescence or early adulthood.


For example, having obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) means to obsessively or compulsively do certain things or think certain thoughts. However, having obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) means to see oneself to see the world outside of oneself in special dysfunctional ways:
http://www.toad.net/~arcturus/dd/ocpdtable.htm


--
Self Image: OCPDs see themselves as responsible (Beck); they are harshly self-critical; they restrain feelings and neglect themselves (Benjamin).

View of Others: OCPDs see others as too casual, irresponsible, self-indulgent, or incompetent (Beck). OCPDs have intense, conflictual feelings toward both themselves and others (Millon).

Defensive Structure: OCPDs operate with a system of rules and standards (Beck). OCPDs live in the future, i.e., they obsess about foreseeing all dangers/problems (Stone).
--


So, personality disorder is different from other disorders in that it is about pervasive self-image and view of others, whereas no other types of disorders have to do with views of self and others.
 
  • #64
hitssquad said:
Self Image: OCPDs see themselves as responsible (Beck); they are harshly self-critical; they restrain feelings and neglect themselves (Benjamin).

View of Others: OCPDs see others as too casual, irresponsible, self-indulgent, or incompetent (Beck). OCPDs have intense, conflictual feelings toward both themselves and others (Millon).

Defensive Structure: OCPDs operate with a system of rules and standards (Beck). OCPDs live in the future, i.e., they obsess about foreseeing all dangers/problems (Stone).
--
ruh roh. sorry. :redface: I feel really bad now. :cry: C'mon - I was just trying to protect you! It's a harsh world out there! Trust me -I know!
*sobs*
 
  • #65
Math Is Hard said:
ruh roh. sorry. :redface: I feel really bad now. :cry: C'mon - I was just trying to protect you! It's a harsh world out there! Trust me -I know!
*sobs*
:smile: And I just noticed your location under your avatar! :smile:
 
  • #66
SOS2008 said:
:smile: And I just noticed your location under your avatar! :smile:
I am hoping one day to travel to Oregon to have a hotdog with Ivan, Tsu, Integral, and Mrs. Integral. You coming?
 
  • #67
Math Is Hard said:
I am hoping one day to travel to Oregon to have a hotdog with Ivan, Tsu, Integral, and Mrs. Integral. You coming?
I've been making hints like crazy! When Tsu is done with the decorating, etc., I've been saying it's BBQ time. But I don't know if I should go uninvited...Ah heck, what am I saying? Yeh, let's go! :-p (I'm trying to do the math--Integral + his better half = ?)
 
  • #68
Huckleberry said:
Thanks Hitsquad! That was very informative and relative to my experience. I would say a high percentage of military officers are OCDP. That type of ingratiating/condemnatory attitude seemed very prevalent. I am probably biased though having been on the receiving end of that condemnatory behavior several times. I had to conform my own behavior to find any kind of peace.
Hmm, I wonder what effect 4 years of doing that would have on me. What I have noticed is that I have much less nationalism, and a greater skepticism of government and authority in general. I tend not to trust people in authority. What might I not have noticed?

Huck
I would say a high percentage of junior officers [capt & below (Lt & below Navy)] exhibit that attitude. That's not the same thing as what HitSquad posted. Their problem is authority with lack of maturity and experience, not a personality disorder. I don't know what the Navy was like - maybe living on a ship creates a different environment, but by time most people make Major, they have the maturity and experience to match their authority.

Edit: Then again, most of the organizations I worked in had a pretty high percentage of nerdish type people (maybe even me), so they might not be that typical, either.
 
Last edited:
  • #69
I was stationed on the ship and had 3 captains in that time. The captain of a ship sets the tone for everyone else. If he is laid back and relaxed then everyone else relaxes a bit. Officers are more leanient and easy-going. LPOs (Leading Petty Officers) generally follow by example. It makes life much easier for everyone.
Sometimes the captains are very authoritarian. This isn't always a bad idea, but to keep a constant level of stress on the crew wears everyone out, officers included. Eventually things start slipping, people go AWOL, arguments turn into rivalries, people seek preferential treatment to avoid work and just an overall drop in moral. And then the oddest part, that particular captain would just get stricter!
He had some very unfortunate accidents during his command. When the deck edge elevator fell off (hanging by a cable) the NIS came into investigate and the rumor was that they determined it was mechanical failure. I heard other rumors too, but I'll keep them to myself.
We broke away from the pier once on a windy day. When two large ships are on the same pier it makes a wind tunnel effect inbetween them. It is the same way with water while transfering supplies with another ship. During high winds and storms the fore and aft lines (the most important) are supposed to be doubled-up to add extra security. The lines that day were not doubled up and I think the force of the wind on the side of the ship from the wind tunnel was enough to tear one of the lines, then the next, and so on. The shore power cable dropped into the water and I heard it blacked out parts of Norfolk. Some of the bollards were ripped out and some of the lines left dents and gashes in the ships hull from the recoil. A tug tried to push us against the pier but we crushed it against a wooden tug pier. We spent about 2 hours trying to send out lines and resecure ourselves while news crews were in the parking lot almost directly beneath the bow. Accidents happen, especially when people are tired and angry.

I didn't hang around with many admirals so I can't tell you what they are like in general. That one seemed alright by me. I've heard that they are usually reasonable men, more like politicians than commanders. Some captains are ok and others are not. We used a term "bucking" for admiral. Those captains are the worst because they just make demands and offer nothing in return.
For years I would have dreams about having to go back into the military and being stationed on the same ship. They were never good dreams. Haven't had one in a while now, maybe a year. This is the effect and the level of control that a captain can have on his crew.

Huck
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K