Does undergraduate school really matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of undergraduate institutions in relation to graduate school admissions and future career prospects. Participants explore whether attending a renowned university for undergraduate studies provides tangible benefits, particularly in the context of applying for graduate programs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the importance of undergraduate institutions after obtaining a graduate degree, suggesting that the focus should be on the quality of education and experiences gained during undergraduate studies.
  • There is a suggestion that graduate schools may discourage applicants from the same undergraduate institution, with some participants sharing personal experiences that support this view.
  • One participant argues that what one does during their undergraduate years is more critical than the institution attended, emphasizing the value of research opportunities and personal fit with the school.
  • Another viewpoint is that while attending a prestigious undergraduate institution can be beneficial, it is not essential for success in graduate school or future careers.
  • Some participants express that many apply to top-ranked schools primarily for their name recognition, rather than the opportunities they provide, and that this can lead to high rejection rates.
  • There is a discussion about the varying perceptions of quality in education, with some asserting that the quality of instruction can differ significantly between institutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the importance of undergraduate institutions, with multiple competing views presented regarding their relevance to graduate school admissions and career outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and opinions, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion includes assumptions about the motivations for attending certain schools and the perceived value of degrees from different institutions.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1
All of my friends are applying for the Ivy leagues and other renowned universities as an undergrad and all of them of course plan to go onto other equally renowned universities for graduate school.

So here is my question, once you do get your graduate degree (Masters or Ph.Ds), how much do people care about your Bachelor's?

I mean do grad schools even accept people from the same undergrad? Let's say I finished my bachelor at Berkeley's, and I want to continue my graduate studies at Berkeley, do you think they will even look at your application as oppose to someone from a different undergrad?

So i guess what I am saying is, is there really an advantage for people who go to renowned undergraduate schools? Any real benefits? I mean is the quality of education that much different? (RateMyProfessors seem to say otherwise...) Do people go there for undergraduate studies just for the name?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flyingpig said:
I mean do grad schools even accept people from the same undergrad? Let's say I finished my bachelor at Berkeley's, and I want to continue my graduate studies at Berkeley, do you think they will even look at your application as oppose to someone from a different undergrad?

I know here at Cornell we kind of push the undergraduates away to encourage them to go somewhere else for grad school. That sentiment always made sense to me, although I know not how widespread it is.
 
Nabeshin said:
I know here at Cornell we kind of push the undergraduates away to encourage them to go somewhere else for grad school. That sentiment always made sense to me, although I know not how widespread it is.

But a nice graduate degree is better than a bachelor from an unknown undergrad institution right?

So what is the advantage of this strategy?
 
Its far more important what you do while an undergrad than where you go. You should go to whatever university will give you the best chance to participate in research opportunities. Once you finish grad school nobody will care about your undergrad. But you can certainly get into good/ the best grad programs from schools that are not Ivy league. I am not saying it doesn't help to go to a well known undergrad because it definitely can help but it won't kill your chances at a good future if you don't. I think most schools encourage their students to go else where just because its important to get a new experience, but I know plenty of people who have stayed at their undergrad institution.
 
flyingpig said:
So here is my question, once you do get your graduate degree (Masters or Ph.Ds), how much do people care about your Bachelor's?

Not very much. I think where you go does matter, but not because of what people think about the degree. The big thing that you need to worry about is getting a good education and finishing the degree.

I mean do grad schools even accept people from the same undergrad? Let's say I finished my bachelor at Berkeley's, and I want to continue my graduate studies at Berkeley, do you think they will even look at your application as oppose to someone from a different undergrad?

It depends on school to school, but the answer is that generally graduate schools strongly discourage undergraduates from the same school. Personally, I think it's a good policy. My undergraduate was a small big name school. My graduate degree came from a big massive public school. Going to two different types of schools was better than going to one type of school.

So i guess what I am saying is, is there really an advantage for people who go to renowned undergraduate schools? Any real benefits? I mean is the quality of education that much different?

Quality is very individual. My undergraduate school was very good for me since it fit the way that I learn. The quality of the classroom instruction isn't that good, but you learn a whole bunch of stuff outside of the classroom. There are other big-name schools that I would have totally hated going to.

Do people go there for undergraduate studies just for the name?

They shouldn't.
 
flyingpig said:
But a nice graduate degree is better than a bachelor from an unknown undergrad institution right?

Not necessarily. What matters is less the degree than what you do with it.
 
twofish-quant said:
Not necessarily. What matters is less the degree than what you do with it.
Would you elaborate on that some? What do you recommend one should do to put a degree from an unknown institution to use for graduate school (or maybe a job)?
 
What is important is that you go to a school that will let you accomplish all your academic goals as an undergraduate. In fact, it's good to go to a school that is strong enough in your particular area that it would give you more opportunities in your area than you could reasonably pursue--this way you have some freedom to pick and choose and eventually excel in your studies, and if you find that one opportunity doesn't work out you can fall back on another equally good one.

For really super ambitious people, such schools are often the top ranked ones but not always. But the rank itself doesn't matter much.

Most people who apply to the top schools do so because of the name recognition. And most people, naturally, are rejected. Those who get in are in general those who make a strong case in their applications that they actually care about the opportunities provided by the school rather than the name and that they will make effective use of these opportunities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K