Does Vector Projection Depend on the Magnitude of Both Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zorodius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projection
Click For Summary
The projection of vector U onto vector V is defined as U cos x, where U is the magnitude of vector U and x is the angle between the two vectors. It is established that this projection does not depend on the magnitude of vector V. The dot product, while related, does not represent a projection unless projecting onto a unit vector, as it yields a scalar rather than a vector. The dot product is influenced by the magnitudes of both vectors, calculated as the product of their lengths and the cosine of the angle between them. Therefore, while the scalar projection can be expressed using the dot product, the projection operation itself is distinct.
Zorodius
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Meaning of "projection"

Suppose you have two vectors, U and V.

Is it correct that the "projection" of vector U onto vector V is equal to U cos x, where U is the magnitude of vector U, and x is the angle between the two vectors? Specifically, is it correct that the projection of one vector onto another vector does not depend on the magnitude of the vector you are projecting on to?

If yes, is it also correct to say that the dot product does not represent a projection, unless you are projecting onto the unit vector?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The projection of u onto v is

\begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \textrm{proj}_{\mathbf v} \mathbf u &amp;= \frac{ \left| \mathbf u \cdot \mathbf v \right| }{ \left| \mathbf v \right|^2} \, \mathbf v\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{ \left| \mathbf u \right| \left| \mathbf v \right| \cos \theta}{ \left| \mathbf v \right|^2} \, \mathbf v<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}

The projection does not depend on the length of the vector projected onto.

The dot product never represents a projection, because the dot product produces a scalar (number), while projection is an operation that produces a vector. I see what you're trying to say, however -- when the vector projected onto is a unit vector, its length is 1 and "disappears" from the denominators above.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
I believe that is correct for the scalar projection of U on V. I suppose you can say that the dot product is not exactly a projection, but a lot of the time you'll see the scalar projection of U on V given as U*V/|V|, where * represents the dot product operation.
 
Or, the dot product is the product of the magnitude of the projection and the magnitude of the vector onto which the projection is made.
 
The dot produkt depends on the lengths of both vectors.
The dot produkt gives the length of the first vector times the lenth of the second vector times the cosine of the angle between them:
v1 dot v2 = Length(v1) * length(v2) * cos(angle)
so if in Zorodius question the length of V is 1 than his dot produkt gives him U cos(x)
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K