Don't quite understand question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the implicit function theorem to the level set defined by the function f(x,y,z) = sin(xyz) + e^{2x + y(z-1)}. The goal is to demonstrate that the level set { f = 1 } can be expressed as x = x(y,z) near the point (0,0,0). The implicit function theorem confirms that within a neighborhood of this point, a function X(y,z) can be defined such that F(y,z) = f(X(y,z), y, z) = 1 holds true for all (y,z) in that region. The discussion also provides an illustrative example using the linear function f(x,y,z) = x + y + z.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the implicit function theorem
  • Familiarity with level sets in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of basic functions and their properties, specifically trigonometric and exponential functions
  • Ability to perform partial differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the implicit function theorem in higher dimensions
  • Learn how to compute partial derivatives using the chain rule
  • Explore examples of level sets for various functions
  • Investigate the behavior of multivariable functions near critical points
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as educators looking for examples of the implicit function theorem and level sets.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
Question: Let [tex]f: \mathbb{R}^3 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/tex] be given by [tex]f(x,y,z) = sin(xyz) + e^{2x + y(z-1)}[/tex]. Show that the level set [tex]\{ f = 1 \}[/tex] can be solved as [tex]x = x(y,z)[/tex] near [tex](0,0,0)[/tex] and compute [tex]\frac{\partial x}{\partial y} (0,0)[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial x}{\partial z} (0,0,0)[/tex].

I don't understand this question. I know what the level set is. It will be the set of points (x,y,z) such that f(x,y,z) = 1. I don't understand what they mean by, show that the level set can be solved as x = x(y,z) near (0,0,0). Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now, if f(x,y,z)=1, the implicit function theorem says that in some region D in the (y,z)-domain around a solution vector [tex](x_{0},y_{0},z_{0})[/tex], we may define a function X(y,z), so that within D, the function F(y,z)=f(X(y,z),y,z)=1 for ALL (y,z) in D.

To take an example.

1. Let f(x,y,z)=x+y+z

Set f=1.

We now define: X(y,z)=1-y-z

Note that we then have:
F(y,z)=f(X(y,z),y,z)=(1-y-z)+y+z=1, irrespective of the values of (y,z).

This holds, for example, in some neighbourhood of the point (1,0,0).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K