Units of Kerr Understanding Mass & Angular Momentum

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kerr Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of mass (M) and angular momentum (J) units in the context of the Kerr solution in general relativity. It clarifies that in "geometric units," where both the gravitational constant (G) and the speed of light (c) are set to 1, mass is treated as having units of length (L). Consequently, angular momentum is expressed as {M L² T⁻¹}, which simplifies to {L²} under these units. This understanding resolves the confusion regarding the dimensional equivalence of mass and angular momentum in the context of the paper referenced.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and the Kerr solution.
  • Familiarity with natural and geometric units in physics.
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics.
  • Concept of angular momentum in classical mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "geometric units in general relativity" for deeper insights.
  • Study the "Kerr solution" to understand black hole mechanics.
  • Explore "dimensional analysis" techniques in theoretical physics.
  • Learn about the implications of setting G and c to 1 in equations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of black hole mechanics and dimensional analysis.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading this paper, and I got confused:

https://projecteuclid.org/journals/...ws-of-black-hole-mechanics/cmp/1103858973.pdf

It discusses the Kerr solution for the case of { M4 > J2 } where M is mass & J is angular momentum. However it seems that angular momentum should have the units { M L2 T-1 }, which would means that M is equivalent to { L2 T-1 }. I could see how M is equivalent to { L2 T-2 }.

What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
swampwiz said:
I was reading this paper, and I got confused:

https://projecteuclid.org/journals/...ws-of-black-hole-mechanics/cmp/1103858973.pdf

It discusses the Kerr solution for the case of { M4 > J2 } where M is mass & J is angular momentum. However it seems that angular momentum should have the units { M L2 T-1 }, which would means that M is equivalent to { L2 T-1 }. I could see how M is equivalent to { L2 T-2 }.

What am I missing here?
I assume the paper is using natural units, where mass length and time all have the same dimension of length.
 
PeroK said:
I assume the paper is using natural units, where mass length and time all have the same dimension of length.
OK, so it seems that you are saying that the constants c & G are to be used in order to get the units to match up?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
swampwiz said:
it seems that angular momentum should have the units { M L2 T-1 }, which would means that M is equivalent to { L2 T-1 }.
In the "geometric units" commonly used in GR, where ##G = c = 1##, this is true, because mass ##M## has units of length (the conversion factor is ##G / c^2## in conventional units) and so does time ##T## (the conversion factor is just ##c## in conventional units). So angular momentum ##J## has units of ##M L^2 T^{-1} = L L^2 L^{-1} = L^2##, i.e., the square of the unit of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
617
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K