Doppler Effect Formula Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Doppler effect and the differences in observed frequency when either a sound source moves towards a stationary observer or when the observer moves towards a stationary sound source. The scope includes theoretical understanding and application of different formulas used to calculate observed frequencies in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the differing results obtained using two different formulas for the Doppler effect, questioning why the observed frequency differs when the source moves versus when the observer moves.
  • Another participant suggests that the asymmetry arises due to the medium through which the sound travels, indicating that the speed of the medium affects the observed frequency differently depending on whether the source or observer is in motion.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the formula used at the new school is a special case for stationary observers, while the formula from the old school is more general and accounts for the asymmetry between source and observer.
  • There is a request for further clarification on the nature of the asymmetry in the context of the Doppler effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the formulas, with some supporting the idea that the two scenarios should yield different results due to the medium's influence, while others express confusion over the implications of the formulas used.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of the formulas in terms of their applicability to different scenarios, specifically regarding the assumptions made about the observer's and source's motion relative to the medium.

tompalatine
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am a high school teacher and I just came across this issue when I began teaching at a new school. I am positive that if I am stationary and a 500 Hz siren comes towards me at 30 m/s, then the observed frequency will increase. I am 99% positive that if the 500 Hz siren is stationary and I move towards it at 30 m/s, the observed frequency will be the exact same.

At my new school, we use the formula:

Frequency observed = frequency [343 / (343 +/- v)]
Obviously the 'v' was the relative velocity of the two objects and adding/subtracting depended on their motion. This made 1st paragraph I described above work out correctly. Whether I move towards a siren or the siren moved towards me, then the observed frequency was the same.

At my old school, we used the formula seen on Wikipedia:

Frequency observed = frequency [(343+/-Vr) / (343 +/- Vs)]

This is what confused me. Using the example above, if a 500 Hz siren comes towards (a stationary) me you would get:

Frequency observed = 500 [(343 + 0) / (343 - 30)] = 547.92 Hz

If I move at the same speed towards a stationary 500 Hz siren, you get:

Frequency observed = 500 [(343 + 30) / (343 + 0)] = 543.73 Hz


How can those be different? The relative velocity between the two is the same. Anyone know what I am doing wrong? Which way is the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tompalatine said:
I am a high school teacher and I just came across this issue
How can those be different? The relative velocity between the two is the same. Anyone know what I am doing wrong? Which way is the correct way?

For waves propagating in a medium, the two values are not supposed to be the same.
The medium breaks the symmetry. The relative speed source-observer is the same but the speed of the medium relative to the observer is not. So the speed of the observer relative to the medium is different in the two cases.
 
nasu said:
For waves propagating in a medium, the two values are not supposed to be the same.
The medium breaks the symmetry. The relative speed source-observer is the same but the speed of the medium relative to the observer is not. So the speed of the observer relative to the medium is different in the two cases.



So when I assumed that a siren moving at 30 m/s towards a stationary listener would create the same observed frequency as the listener moving at 30 m/s moving towards a stationary siren...I was wrong?
 
I am afraid so. :smile:

The formula used at your new school is a special case of the general one, for stationary observer.
Most of the examples on the web are for this special case.

The "old school" formula is more general. I am surprised that you did not realize the asymmetry between source and observer, if you say you used this general formula for some time.
 
nasu said:
I am afraid so. :smile:

The formula used at your new school is a special case of the general one, for stationary observer.
Most of the examples on the web are for this special case.

The "old school" formula is more general. I am surprised that you did not realize the asymmetry between source and observer, if you say you used this general formula for some time.

Can someone explain why there is an asymmetry in a little bit more detail?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K