Doppler Effect II (Both observer and source in motion)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the Doppler Effect, specifically with both the observer and the source (an eagle) in motion. The scenario includes an aircraft flying towards the eagle, which emits a sound at a specific frequency while both are moving relative to the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Doppler Effect formula, questioning the correctness of their calculations and the assumptions regarding the direction of motion.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the calculations related to the frequency heard by the observer. Some participants have confirmed their results align with each other, while others express uncertainty about their own computations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accuracy in calculations and the potential for errors in interpretation of the Doppler Effect formula. There is an acknowledgment of limited attempts to solve the problem, which may influence the discussion dynamics.

exi
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You're flying in an aircraft at 46 m/s. An eagle flies directly towards you at 11 m/s. Speeds are relative to ground.

The eagle emits a cry at 3400 Hz, and the speed of sound is 330 m/s. What frequency do you hear?

Homework Equations



f_o = f_s\left( \frac{1\pm\frac{v_o}{v}}{1\mp\frac{v_s}{v}} \right)

Because the observer and source are both moving towards each other (presumably?),

f_o = f_s\left( \frac{1+\frac{v_o}{v}}{1-\frac{v_s}{v}} \right)

The Attempt at a Solution



Seems simple enough, but

f_o = 3400\left( \frac{1+\frac{46}{330}}{1-\frac{11}{330}} \right)

Works out to 4902.8213 Hz, a wrong answer. This problem seemed straightforward, but I'm not sure what I'm missing.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your math. That's not what I get.
 
Dick said:
Check your math. That's not what I get.

Don't I feel silly, part 2.

4007.5235 Hz. I've got only one remaining shot at that problem; I didn't make any other conceptual mistakes, correct?
 
That's what I get, but I'm not claiming infallibility.
 
Dick said:
That's what I get, but I'm not claiming infallibility.

It's correct.

Thanks much, sir; I'll just whistle and blame my calculator now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K