Double integral/change of variable

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hnh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
hnh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, it may look long but if written down-
is really quite short, I have only included a detailed explanation to try and be more clear.
My question is; I am doing a change of variable which doesn't seem to 'fit' the theory of finding the jacobian to make
the transformation. It seems to me that I make a straightforward substitution:

The integral is \int\int_A f'(t) ln( f(x) - f(t) + t - x)dxdt In my area, x <= t so the order cannot be switched.

I make the following change of variable:

Let r=x-f(x) and h(r) = x and let s=t-f(t) and h(s)=t
notice that this gives f(x)=h(r)-r and f(t)=h(s)-s, hence f'(t)dxdt = dxf'(t)dt = h'(r)dr(h'(s) - 1)ds=h'(r)(h'(s)-1)drds.

Now the integral appears to be

\int\int_A' ln(r-s)h'(r)(h'(s)-1)drds

Is this correct-can I do this change of variable without actually doing the jacobian. It seems that I do not actually
have the integral \int\int f(x,y) dxdt in this case to make the transformation with the jacobian so I am wondering
if there is anything wrong with the way I have done this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it would work because your r and s variables are not each one dependent on x and t at the same time, so it's like you're doing two one-variable changes, so you really are doing the Jacobian thingy even if you don't realize that you are, if you know what I mean. You have:[tex]r(x) \equiv x -f(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ x=h(r);[/tex]
[tex]s(t) \equiv t-f(t) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ t=h(s);[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=x-r(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ f(x(r)) \equiv F(r) = h(r)-r;[/tex]
[tex]f(t)=t-s(t) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ f(t(s)) \equiv F(s) = h(s)-s;[/tex] The Jacobian would be:

[tex] <br /> J = det \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac {\partial x} {\partial r} & \frac {\partial t} {\partial r}\\<br /> \frac {\partial x} {\partial s} & \frac {\partial t} {\partial s}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) = det<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> h'(r) & 0\\<br /> 0 & h'(s)<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) = h'(r) h'(s)<br /> [/tex]

so you have:

[tex]dxdt = J \ dr ds = h'(r) h'(s) dr ds[/tex]

and

[tex]ln|f(x(r))-f(t(s))+t(s)-x(r)| = ln|s-r|[/tex]

and

[tex]f'(t) \ = \ \frac {df} {dt} = \left( 1 - \frac {ds} {dt} \right)[/tex]

And so:

[tex] <br /> \iint_\textrm{A} f'(t) \ ln|f(x)-f(t)+t-x|dxdt = \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( 1 - \frac {ds} {dt} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) h'(s) dr ds= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- \frac {ds} {dt} \frac {dh} {ds} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds[/tex]

[tex]= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- \frac {ds} {dt} \frac {dt} {ds} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- 1 \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds<br /> [/tex]

which is what you got so I think it's correct :)
 
Thank you very much-that is a huge help!