B Double slit experiment combined with Stern-Gerlach

Click For Summary
In a double slit experiment with electrons followed by a Stern-Gerlach apparatus, the outcome depends on the orientation of the Stern-Gerlach device relative to the slits. If the setup is configured correctly, each spin state will produce its own interference pattern, resulting in two distinct rows corresponding to the spin states. The interference pattern is not lost; instead, it is preserved within each spin-separated row. Factors such as the separation of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus and the size of the interference fringes play a crucial role in the observed results. Overall, the combination of these experiments can reveal complex quantum behavior.
Nocturnial
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Would you still see an interference pattern if electrons were put through a Stern-Gerlach device after the double slit?
A bit of background: I've read Derive the probability of spin at arbitrary angle is cos( ) | Physics Forums post in this forum and went into a "thought rabbit hole". It didn't make any sense to me and I think I made a wrong assumption somewhere along the way. Instead of typing everything out, I thought it would be helpful to split my assumptions in several different posts.

In a double slit experiment with electrons you'll see an interference pattern (with enough electrons fired). Suppose after the double slit you put a Stern-Gerlach type experiment. Would you still see an interference pattern, but it separated into two rows depending on the spin or is the interference pattern lost?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The exact result depends on the details of the experiment, like the relative orientation of the SG with respect to the slit, the SG separation compared to the size of the fringes, etc., but yes, the SG spots would each show an interference pattern.
 

Thread 'Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude'

For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Double-dark Slit Interference Pattern?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
B Yet another double slit thought experiment...
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
B Double-slit with movable detector screen
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
B What is causing destructive interference in double slit experiment?
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
652
I Is Calcite a parallel to the Stern-Gerlach experiment?
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
B Double Double Slit Experiment -- Question about Variations
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Q - Double slit experiment, delayed slit selection observation
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Double-slit experiment, determining which slit an electron passed thru
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
B Double Slit Experiment: Dumb question that needs to be asked
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K