Double Slit Experiment with Electrons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the double slit experiment with electrons, highlighting the behavior of electrons as quantum objects. When a detector is placed between the slits, only particle-like behavior is observed, resulting in discrete dots rather than an interference pattern. This phenomenon occurs because measuring the electrons collapses their wave function, eliminating the wave-like behavior. The conversation emphasizes that electrons are neither particles nor waves but exhibit characteristics of both depending on the measurement apparatus used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave function collapse
  • Knowledge of measurement effects in quantum experiments
  • Basic grasp of the double slit experiment
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum mechanics and wave function collapse
  • Explore the implications of measurement in quantum physics
  • Study the historical context of the double slit experiment
  • Examine experimental setups demonstrating electron behavior in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the foundational principles of quantum behavior and measurement effects.

  • #31
diemilio said:
So what you're saying is that the measurement itself in a way "corrupts" the original experiment so the results of the original test change, correct? That I can understand.

No.

I am saying that the thing being measured and what you measure it with interacts, becomes entangled (specifically via decoherence), and when that happens interference terms are suppressed.

That might be techno-babble, but unfortunately its the best I can do.

The following will explain it carefully:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465036678/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Warning - it requires math. But unfortunately that's the only way to explain it CORRECTLY. You will find plenty of popularisations that purport to explain it but mostly its rubbish. Susskind avoids such issues - but your thinking cap needs to be on.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
bhobba said:
No.

I am saying that the thing being measured and what you measure it with interacts, becomes entangled (specifically via decoherence), and when that happens interference terms are suppressed.

That might be techno-babble, but unfortunately its the best I can do.

The following will explain it carefully:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465036678/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Warning - it requires math. But unfortunately that's the only way to explain it CORRECTLY. You will find plenty of popularisations that purport to explain it but mostly its rubbish. Susskind avoids such issues - but your thinking cap needs to be on.

Thanks
Bill

Thanks Bill, I will check out the reference. I have "OK" math skills, so I think I should be fine. If you happen to know of a paper where they show the experimental results I am looking for I would appreciate it.

Thanks again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
465
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K