MHB Double Sum Challenge: Equate the Limit

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathbalarka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of a double sum given by $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j}$$. Participants analyze the equivalence of the double series to a single sum involving the number of pairs $(i, j)$ that sum to a constant $k$. The limit simplifies to a form that includes terms dependent on $n$, leading to a final evaluation of the limit as 2. Corrections to initial solutions are provided, emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations in reaching the correct limit. The challenge highlights various approaches to solving the problem within the mathematical community.
mathbalarka
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Equate the limit

$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j}$$

Note : This was a challenge from a user in mathstackexchange. From a glance, there should be many ways to do it, so partly I posed this problem to see how the resident analysts in MHB handle it. (although if you think this is solely an analytic problem, you're mistaken ;))
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathbalarka said:
Equate the limit

$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j}$$

[sp]The double series is equivalent to ...

$\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{1}{i + j} = \sum_{k=2}^{2 n} \frac{a_{k}}{k}\ (1)$

... where $a_{k}$ is the number of pair of i and j such that i + j = k. It is easy to see that...

$\displaystyle a_{k} = k-1\ \text{if}\ k<2 n, = 1,\ \text{if}\ k=2 n\ (2)$

... so that...

$\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n}\ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{1}{i + j} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n}\ \{ \sum_{k=2}^{2n -1} \frac{k-1}{k} + \frac{1}{2 n} \} = \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2 n - 3}{n} + \frac{1}{2 n^{2}} - \frac{1}{n}\ \sum_{k=2}^{2 n-1} \frac{1}{k} = 2\ (3)$ [/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I am sorry, chisigma, but your solution is incorrect. You are on the right track, however. If you wish to check your solution and repost it, you're more than welcome.
 
mathbalarka said:
Equate the limit

$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j}$$

We have

$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{1}{i + j}$

$\displaystyle = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n^2} \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \dfrac{1}{\frac{i}{n} + \frac{j}{n}}$

$\displaystyle = \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \frac{1}{x + y} \, dx\, dy$

$\displaystyle = \int_0^1 (\log(1 + y) - \log(y))\, dy$

$\displaystyle = \int_1^2 \log(y)\, dy - \int_0^1 \log(y)\, dy$

$\displaystyle = (y\log(y) - y)|_{y = 1}^2 - (y\log(y) - y)|_{y = 0}^1$

$\displaystyle = [(2 \log(2) - 2) - (\log(1) - 1)] - [(\log(1) - 1)]$

$\displaystyle = (2\log(2) - 1) + 1$

$\displaystyle = 2\log(2)$.
 
Here's a correction to chisigma's solution.

$$\sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j} = \sum_{k = 2}^{2n} \frac{c_{k, n}}{k}$$

Where $c_{k, n}$ is the number of partitions of $k$ in two parts, each of size at most $n$. chisigma's flaw in the proof was that he assumed $c_{k, n} = k - 1$, which is true if and only if $k \leq n$. For $k > n$, $c_{k, n} = 2n - k + 1$. Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \sum_{k = 2}^{2n} \frac{c_{k, n}}{k} = \sum_{k = 2}^{n} \frac{k - 1}{k} + \sum_{k = n + 1}^{2n} \frac{2n - k + 1}{k} \, &= \textcolor{red}{\sum_{k = 2}^n 1} - \textcolor{green}{\sum_{k = 2}^n \frac1{k}} - \textcolor{goldenrod}{\sum_{k = n + 1}^{2n} 1} + \textcolor{blue}{\sum_{k = n+1}^{2n} \frac{2n + 1}{k}} \\ &= \textcolor{red}{(n - 1)} \, - \, \textcolor{green}{\left ( H_n - 1 \right )} \, - \, \textcolor{goldenrod}{n} \, + \, \textcolor{blue}{(2n + 1) \left ( H_{2n} - H_n\right )} \\ &= -H_n + (2n + 1)\left ( H_{2n} - H_n \right ) \end{aligned}$$

Using $H_n \sim \log(n)$ and that $\log(n) = o(n)$

$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1n \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = 1}^n \frac1{i + j} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{(2n+1)( H_{2n} - H_n ) - H_n}{n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left [ \left ( 2 + \frac1n \right) \log(2) - \frac{\log(n)}{n}\right ] = 2 \log(2)$$

What could possibly be a better way to puzzle an analyst than solving this problem number theoretically? :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top