Understanding the Permitted Use of Double Summation in Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter IniquiTrance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the permitted use of double summation in mathematics, specifically regarding the expression involving sums of sequences a_{ik} and b_{kj}. It is clarified that the original formulation is incorrect because it improperly sums over k while treating b_{kj} as a constant outside the sum. The correct approach involves rearranging the summation order and applying the properties of summation to maintain validity. Ultimately, the correct double summation leads to the conclusion that the result equals 1. Understanding the proper application of summation rules is crucial for accurate mathematical expressions.
IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
If I know that \sum_{k=1}^n a_{ik} = 1 and \sum_{j=1}^n b_{kj} = 1, why is the following permitted?

\sum_{j=1}^n \sum_{k=1}^n a_{ik}b_{kj} = \left(\sum_{j=1}^n b_{kj}\right) \left(\sum_{k=1}^n a_{ik}\right) = 1\cdot 1 = 1


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not permitted. What you wrote makes no sense since you sum over k and one of the b_{kj} is outside that sum. That is not allowed.

What you could do is:

\sum_{j=1}^n\sum_{k=1}^n a_{ik}b{kj}= \sum_{k=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n a_{ik}b_{kj} = \sum_{k=1}^n \left(a_{ik} \sum_{j=1}^n b_{kj}\right)= \sum_{k=1}^n a_{ik}=1
 
Thank you very much. I knew I wasn't understanding something.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K