I Doubling Ionization of Tungsten: Effects on Energy?

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the ionization of tungsten atoms results in twice the energy gain when accelerated through the same electric potential. While the initial question about a mole of tungsten is valid, it is more accurate to consider a single atom due to the effects of mutual repulsion among charged particles. This repulsion can diminish the practical impact of the electric potential at larger scales. Nonetheless, the principle remains that a doubly ionized atom will acquire double the kinetic energy compared to a singly ionized atom under identical conditions. Thus, the concept holds true despite the complexities introduced by larger quantities of ions.
illisil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Ionization and the relationship to kinetic energy
Lets say that i have i mole of tungsten atoms. They are all ionized, only one electron is removed from each atom. If i accelerate this mole of tungsten atoms through one electron volt, i would get 96.48 kj. If the mole of tungsten was doubly ionized, two electrons removed from each atom, and accelerated through one ev, would i get twice the kilojoules?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is yes.

One persnickety comment: electron volts is a unit of energy. I think you meant one volt of electric potential.

One caveat: it would be cleaner to ask the question about a single atom rather than a mole of atoms. With many charged particles you will have to think about their mutual repulsion, and then the potential would depend on their density. The problem is that at any practical lab scale density of a whole mole of ionized atoms would have mutual repulsion so strong your one volt potential would be completely negligible in comparison. However, I get what you meant.

Even if the potential is dominated by their mutual repulsion, the idea that, given the same initial configuration, twice the charge gives twice the energy is still true. So your idea is still correct. Just, in that case, the 1 volt becomes unimportant.

Anyhow, rephrasing it, a doubly ionized atom falling through one volt of electric potential will gain twice as much kinetic energy as a singly ionized atom falling through the same potential.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu and Dale
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top