I Doubling Ionization of Tungsten: Effects on Energy?

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the ionization of tungsten atoms results in twice the energy gain when accelerated through the same electric potential. While the initial question about a mole of tungsten is valid, it is more accurate to consider a single atom due to the effects of mutual repulsion among charged particles. This repulsion can diminish the practical impact of the electric potential at larger scales. Nonetheless, the principle remains that a doubly ionized atom will acquire double the kinetic energy compared to a singly ionized atom under identical conditions. Thus, the concept holds true despite the complexities introduced by larger quantities of ions.
illisil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Ionization and the relationship to kinetic energy
Lets say that i have i mole of tungsten atoms. They are all ionized, only one electron is removed from each atom. If i accelerate this mole of tungsten atoms through one electron volt, i would get 96.48 kj. If the mole of tungsten was doubly ionized, two electrons removed from each atom, and accelerated through one ev, would i get twice the kilojoules?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is yes.

One persnickety comment: electron volts is a unit of energy. I think you meant one volt of electric potential.

One caveat: it would be cleaner to ask the question about a single atom rather than a mole of atoms. With many charged particles you will have to think about their mutual repulsion, and then the potential would depend on their density. The problem is that at any practical lab scale density of a whole mole of ionized atoms would have mutual repulsion so strong your one volt potential would be completely negligible in comparison. However, I get what you meant.

Even if the potential is dominated by their mutual repulsion, the idea that, given the same initial configuration, twice the charge gives twice the energy is still true. So your idea is still correct. Just, in that case, the 1 volt becomes unimportant.

Anyhow, rephrasing it, a doubly ionized atom falling through one volt of electric potential will gain twice as much kinetic energy as a singly ionized atom falling through the same potential.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu and Dale
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top