Undergrad Doubt about proof on self-adjoint operators.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that for every linear transformation \( A \) between finite-dimensional spaces, the product \( A^*A \) is self-adjoint. The proof is established as \( (A^*A)^* = A^{**}A^* = A^*A \). A common misconception is addressed regarding the equality \( (AA^*)^* = A^{**}A^* \) and the assumption that \( AA^* \) is self-adjoint only if \( A \) and \( A^* \) commute. The correct understanding is clarified with the property \( (AB)^* = B^*A^* \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in finite-dimensional spaces
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint operators
  • Familiarity with the adjoint operation denoted as \( A^* \)
  • Basic properties of matrix multiplication and transposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of adjoint operators in linear algebra
  • Learn about self-adjoint operators and their significance in functional analysis
  • Explore the implications of operator commutativity in linear transformations
  • Review the proof techniques for properties of linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone studying operator theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties of self-adjoint operators and linear transformations.

Rodrigo Schmidt
Messages
14
Reaction score
5
So the statement which the proof's about is: For every linear transformation ##A##(between finite dimension spaces), the product ##A^*A## is self-adjoint. So, the proof is:
##(A^*A)^*=A^*A^{**}=A^*A##
What i don't understand is why ##(A^*A)^*=A^*A^{**}##. Isn't that true only if ##A## and ##A^*##commute?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rodrigo Schmidt said:
So the statement which the proof's about is: For every linear transformation ##A##(between finite dimension spaces), the product ##AA^*## is self-adjoint. So, the proof is:
##(AA^*)^*=A^*A^{**}=A^*A##
What I don't understand is ##(AA^*)^*=A^*A^{**}##. Shouldn't ##(AA^*)^*##be equal to ##A^*A^{**} = A^*A##? Wouldn't this mean that ##AA^*## is self-adjoint only if ##A## and ##A^*## commute?

Your post is very confused, because you have posted the same thing twice as both the correct and wrong versions. What you meant to say, no doubt was:

The proof is given as:

##(AA^*)^* = A^{**}A^* = AA^*##

But, you think it should be:

##(AA^*)^* = A^*A^{**} = A^*A##

But, you are wrong, because:

##(AB)^* = B^*A^*## and not ##A^*B^*##
 
  • Like
Likes Rodrigo Schmidt
PeroK said:
AB)∗=B∗A∗(AB)^* = B^*A^* and not A∗B∗
Oh, thank you! I totally forgot that.
 
think through the proof of these more basic facts.
 
  • Like
Likes Rodrigo Schmidt
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K