Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Doubts on 2D and 3D Ising Model

  1. Aug 26, 2013 #1
    Considering [itex]d=2[/itex] or [itex]d=3[/itex], the Ising model exhibits a second order phase transition at the critical temperature [itex]T_c[/itex], where the system goes from an ordered phase (spins preferably aligned in a certain direction) to a disordered one. This is reflected by the behaviour of the susceptibility, similar to a Dirac delta in [itex]T_c[/itex]; and, being the susceptibility a second order derivative of the free energy, we talk about second order phase transition.

    Let's pass to the specific heat. Experimental results show that in [itex]T_c[/itex] also the specific heat has a Dirac delta beaviour, for both [itex]d=2[/itex] and [itex]d=3[/itex]; the literature usually says that [itex]C(T) \sim |T_c-T|^{-\alpha}[/itex], with [itex]\alpha=0[/itex] for [itex]d=2[/itex] and [itex]\alpha\sim 0.11[/itex] for [itex]d=3[/itex].

    Now, my questions are:

    - Why [itex]\alpha=0[/itex] for [itex]d=2[/itex], if numerical results show a Dirac delta behaviour? And, if this divergence really exists, I guess that we can't talk of first order transition, being the specific heat a first derivative of energy (and not of free energy). Am I right?

    - When does the Ising model exhibits a first order phase transition? I've read that in presence of an external magnetic field the magnetization can show a "jump", and hence a first order transition. Is this true?
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 26, 2013 #2
    I didn't consider that heat capacity is actually a second derivative of Helmholtz free energy [itex]F[/itex]. Anyway, my question remains: has the 2D/3D Ising model a second order phase transition for both the susceptibility and the specific heat? And is there a first order phase transition when considering to vary the external field [itex]h[/itex]?
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  4. Aug 26, 2013 #3
    Apparently, with [itex]\alpha=0[/itex] it is implied for the specific heat to diverge logarithmically, i.e. [itex]\sim -\log(1-T/T_c)[/itex]. Hence, I guess that we can consider the heat capacity as another expression of the second phase transition, being the specific heat a second derivative of the free energy.

    Now, just one question remains: is it true that, for a fixed [itex]T<T_c[/itex], there is a first order transition, i.e. a jump in the magnetization when varying the external field [itex]h[/itex]?
  5. Aug 26, 2013 #4
    If we define Tc as the zero-field critical temperature for the ferromagnetic phase transition, then for T<Tc, varying h does not cause any phase change. There can be a discontinuous change in the magnetization (if we start in a ferromagnetic phase pointing along h and then we gradually make h go to some big value pointing opposite to the magnetization, then the magnetization can flip) but this is still a ferromagnetic phase. (Think hysteresis: Hysteresis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.) You don't want to define a phase in terms of the magnetization vector because turning a magnet should not change its phase. Instead you should look at the order parameter.
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  6. Aug 27, 2013 #5
    Thank you! This makes perfectly sense.

    Just a question: with order parameter you mean the temperature, right?

    EDIT: The order parameter in the Ising model is the magnetization itself, which is different from zero in the ordered phase (and viceversa).
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook