Doubts regarding basic chemistry concepts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the law of reciprocal proportions and the concept of equivalent weight in chemistry. Participants explore the implications of these concepts, particularly focusing on the significance of order in ratios and the interpretation of equivalent weight in terms of parts by mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the order of elements in the ratios affects the application of the law of reciprocal proportions, proposing a scenario involving elements A, B, and C.
  • Another participant finds the numerical descriptions confusing and suggests that ratios should be considered in moles rather than just mass.
  • A later reply presents a revised numerical formulation and questions whether reversing the order of elements violates the law of reciprocal proportions, stating that their calculations suggest it does not hold true.
  • One participant discusses the importance of mole ratios in chemical reactions and the conversion between moles and masses using molecular weights.
  • Another participant concludes that order does matter in the ratios, proposing that the principle could be better stated to reflect that the ratio will be a whole number or reciprocal whole number multiple of the ratio in which A and B combine.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of order in the law of reciprocal proportions, with some suggesting it matters while others question the validity of this assertion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the interpretation of equivalent weight or the implications of the law of reciprocal proportions, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the arguments presented.

donaldparida
Messages
146
Reaction score
10
Doubts regarding the law of reciprocal proportions: What i have understood by reading the definition is that the ratio of the masses in which two elements A and B combine with a fixed mass of a third element C, will be a whole number multiple of the ratio of the masses in which A and B combine with each other.
My question is that is order important here? Let A and C combine in the ratio a:c1 and let B and C combine in the ratio b:c2=((b*c1)/c2):c1.(by mass). Then according to the law of reciprocal proportions, a:((b*c1)/c2)=k (a:b) where k ia whole number. If we reverse the order in which we consider the mass of the elements in the ratio, will we get the same result then also? (Is ((b*c1)/c2):a=j (b:a) where j is a whole number in that case also).

Doubts regarding equivalent weight:I do understand the definition of equivalent weight but cannot make sense of it and understand the significance of the definition. What is the meaning of "parts by mass"
in it's definition and what is the use of equivalent weight?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Your concept is good but your numerical description using symbols is confusing. Maybe try again.

Combining ratios of elements really does make use of ratio IN MOLES. We use then a ratio of MASS to MOLES to make a conversion into PARTS BY MASS, if we want it; but finding the result as simple ratio between whole numbers takes more work/effort.
 
Here is the numerical part with proper editing.
Let A and C combine in the ratio \frac{a}{c1} and let B and C combine in the ratio \frac{b}{c2}=\frac{b*c1}{c1*c2}.(by mass). Then according to the law of reciprocal proportions, \frac{a*c2}{b*c1}=k \frac{a}{b} where k is whole number. If we reverse the order in which we consider the mass of the elements in the ratio, will we get the same result then also? (Is \frac{b*c1}{a*c2}=j \frac{b}{a} where j is a whole number in that case also). I had done some calculations and i found out that this is not true. So is this violating the law of reciprocal proportions?
 
Many people learned compounds being made according to mole ratios, and reactions occurring along mole ratios of the reactants. Then people were taught about "molecular" weights and using them to convert moles to masses, and then people might have also been taught about gravimetric factors. Remember the word, "stoichiometry"?

If given reactants or products in grams or kilograms, they can be converted to moles, using their formula weights or molecular weights. If given reactants or products in moles, they can be converted to their masses using their formula weights or molecular weights.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HAYAO and Chestermiller
If a*c2/b*c1 = k*a/b, it follows that the reciprocal b*c1/a*c2 = (1/k)*b/a. If k is a whole number, 1/k is not, unless k =1. So yes, order matters. A better statement of the principle would be that the ratio will be a whole number or reciprocal whole number (or perhaps, even more generally, the ratio of two whole numbers) multiple of the ratio in which A and B combine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
21K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K