Dr. Mae-Wan Ho: Genetisist & Director of ISIS

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    biotechnology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Dr. Mae-Wan Ho is a geneticist and the director of The Institute of Science in Society (ISIS), which campaigns against perceived unethical uses of biotechnology. While she has published articles, many are not peer-reviewed and do not focus on biotechnology. Discussions indicate that her views are considered extreme and critical of mainstream research, leading to questions about her legitimacy as a scientist. Overall, she is viewed as operating on the fringe of scientific discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of genetic research methodologies
  • Familiarity with peer review processes in scientific publishing
  • Knowledge of biotechnology ethics
  • Awareness of scientific discourse and critique
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the peer review process in scientific journals
  • Explore the ethical implications of biotechnology
  • Investigate the role of opinion pieces in scientific literature
  • Learn about the impact of fringe science on public perception
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, students in the life sciences, ethicists in biotechnology, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and public policy.

Gold Barz
Messages
464
Reaction score
0
Has anyone on here ever heard of Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, she is a geneticist according to her Wikipedia page, she is director of the The Institute of Science in Society (ISIS), an interest group that campaigns against what it sees as unethical uses of biotechnology and has some VERY wild ideas.

The reason I am asking this is because basically I want to know if she is a legit scientist that does legit science because some of her ideas make me think otherwise.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
She appears to be a legitimate scientist with some extreme views. I've never heard of ISIS and their poor quality website indicated they're probably not a huge organisation. Also flicking through some of their articles show them to be quite critical of a lot of mainstream research. Dr Ho does have some publications under her belt (though I couldn't find a full list) however most of it is unrelated to biotechnology. An article that I did find related to biotech was published by ISIS and so isn't peer reviewed.

I did find a response published in Nature to an opinion piece she wrote in Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease that addresses some of the comments she has made as well as this article that goes over a lot more of the science. I wouldn't say she was a crackpot or anything but she seems to be on the fringe (writing opinion pieces and publishing in non-peer reviewed journals doesn't help).
 
Last edited:
Yeah "on the fringe" seems about right, thanks Ryan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K