MHB Draw Line of Best Fit: Canada Exchange Rate US Dollar 1998-2007

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobosdeimos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fit Lines
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the line of best fit for the average annual exchange rate of the US Dollar in Canada from 1998 to 2007. A user attempted to determine the slope and y-intercept but expressed uncertainty about the results. Another participant clarified that the original request was solely for a scatter plot, not for calculating a line of best fit. They emphasized the importance of understanding the difference between a scatter plot and a line of best fit. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in interpreting data visualization tasks.
Phobosdeimos
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The average annual exchange rate in Canada for the US Dollar from 1998-2007 is shown in the following table. Draw a scatter plot, without using graphing technology

Year Exchange Rate
1998 .67
1999 .67
2000 .70
2001 .74
2002 .80
2003 .81
2004 .86
2005 .87
2006 .90
2007 .99

To determine the Slope I did the following
1998 - 2006 = -8
.67 - .90 = -.23

y= .23
Divide
x = -8

The slope of the line is - 0.02875

I then tried the y intercept
y = mx +b

.90 = - 0.02875 (2006) + b

.90 = -57.6725 + b

.90
- 57.6725 = b

b = 58.5725

This is what I came up for the y Intercept (58.5725)

Doesn't seem right to me

Please Help

Phobos
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Phobosdeimos said:
The average annual exchange rate in Canada for the US Dollar from 1998-2007 is shown in the following table. Draw a scatter plot, without using graphing technology

Year Exchange Rate
1998 .67
1999 .67
2000 .70
2001 .74
2002 .80
2003 .81
2004 .86
2005 .87
2006 .90
2007 .99

To determine the Slope I did the following
1998 - 2006 = -8
.67 - .90 = -.23

y= .23
Divide
x = -8

The slope of the line is - 0.02875

I then tried the y intercept
y = mx +b

.90 = - 0.02875 (2006) + b

.90 = -57.6725 + b

.90
- 57.6725 = b

b = 58.5725

This is what I came up for the y Intercept (58.5725)

Doesn't seem right to me

Please Help

Phobos

Hi Phobosdeimos,

The question tells you to draw a scatter plot according to the given data. Your slope and y-intercept is for the straight line that goes through the two points $(1998, 0.67)$ and $(2006, 0.90)$. If the points given approximately lie on a straight line you can find the best fitting straight line using linear regression as below.

Introduction to Linear Regression
 
Very interesting to read this article.I would like to thank you for the efforts you had made for writing this awesome article. This article inspired me to read more. keep it up.
<a href="https://www.excelr.com/blog/data-science/statistics-for-data-scientist/Correlation-vs-covariance">Correlation vs Covariance</a>
<a href="https://www.excelr.com/blog/data-science/regression/simple-linear-regression">Simple linear regression</a>
<a href="https://www.excelr.com/mock-interview/data-science-interview-questions">data science interview questions</a>
 
I am confused. You titled this "Line of best fit" and show how you have tried to calculate a slope and y-intercept. But the problem, at least the part you show, says nothing about any line! It asks only for a scatter plot. Do you know what that is?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scatter_plot
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top