Drawing 1-bromo-6-chlorodispiro [2.1.2^5.1^3] octane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correct structural representation of 1-bromo-6-chlorodispiro [2.1.2^5.1^3] octane. Both proposed structures yield the same IUPAC name, highlighting the complexity of polycyclic nomenclature. To differentiate between the two compounds, one must refer to IUPAC guidelines, specifically section SP-9 of the referenced document, which emphasizes the use of cis/trans conventions or the absolute chiral configuration (R vs. S) at the 3 and 5 carbons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of IUPAC nomenclature for polycyclic compounds
  • Familiarity with chiral centers and stereochemistry
  • Knowledge of chemical structure drawing tools
  • Access to IUPAC documentation and resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research IUPAC guidelines for polycyclic compounds
  • Learn about cis/trans and R/S nomenclature conventions
  • Explore chemical structure drawing software like ChemDraw
  • Review stereochemistry principles in organic chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers involved in structural analysis and nomenclature of complex organic compounds.

Sunwoo Bae
Messages
60
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The nomenclature for a compound is given: 1-bromo-6-chlorodispiro [2.1.2^5.1^3] octane
Draw the structure of this compound
Relevant Equations
none
1618413891884.png

I tried drawing the structure, and I do not know which one of the two is the correct compound for the nomenclature.
Which one would be the correct one, and why?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, kudos to you for getting the right ring structure! Polycyclic IUPAC conventions caused me no end of headaches in school.

Actually answering your question is a bit tricky. If you, for instance, plug both formulas into an online IUPAC namer, you get the same name for both compounds. However, if you actually look at models of the two, you see that they are in fact distinct compounds. This means you have to go to the source IUPAC documents for the answer. I found one of relevance here (possibly paywalled):
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351/pac199971030531/html
See section SP-9 in the link above. The numbering always goes to the lower locant. So both compounds are in fact 1-bromo-6-chloro. To distinguish them, per the document above, a cis/trans convention is used (apparently E and Z are only used for double bonds). Alternatively, you can determine the absolute chiral configuration (R vs. S) at the 3 and 5 carbons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and Sunwoo Bae

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
817