Drop a stone in a well - Waves problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostanime2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drop Waves
Click For Summary
The problem involves calculating the total time it takes to hear a splash after dropping a stone into a 7.35 m deep well. The time for the stone to fall is calculated as 1.22 seconds, while the sound takes an additional 0.0857 seconds to travel back up, totaling 1.3 seconds. However, the expected answer is 1.24 seconds, prompting questions about the assumptions made regarding the well's properties. The discussion raises concerns about treating the well as an open-closed tube and the implications of the well being partially filled with water. The key issue revolves around the accurate representation of the well's dimensions and the behavior of sound waves in this context.
ghostanime2001
Messages
256
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You drop a stone from rest into a well that is 7.35 m deep. How long does it take before you
hear the splash?

d=7.35 m
v=343 m/s (because the disturbance is air molecules and the medium is air not water)

Homework Equations


d=\dfrac{1}{2}gt_{1}^{2}

\lambda=4d and v=\lambda f and we know that f is f=\dfrac{1}{T}

The Attempt at a Solution


The time taken for the stone to drop in water:
t_{1}=\sqrt{\dfrac{2d}{g}}=1.22 s

The time taken for the reflected wave to make it outside the well
v=\dfrac{4d}{T}
So, T=\dfrac{4d}{v}=\dfrac{4(7.35)}{343}=0.0857 s

Finally,
t_{total}=t_{1}+t_{2} = 1.22 s + 0.0857 s = 1.3 s

However this is wrong! the answer is 1.24 seconds. What am i doing wrong?

My first initial thought is to think of the well as an open-closed tube. When those relevant equations are applied to a open-closed tube I get the wrong answer. Why is thinking of the well as a open-closed tube wrong ?

1. Is it because a little portion of the well at the bottom is filled with water so that the ENTIRE well is not actually 7.35 m ? OR

2. Is it because we have no information about its wavelength regardless if it's a open-closed tube? OR

3. Does the wavelength calculated above does not make sense ? (e.g. How can the wavelength be 29.4 m when the well itself is 7.35 m ? (Assuming the well as a long cylinder)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the time for the stone to fall and hit the water correct = 1.22s
This makes a noise and the sound has to travel to the top of the well, 7.35m and the speed of sound = 343m/s. Calculate the time taken for sound to travel this distance.
How much time has passed since you dropped the stone??
 
But what about the wavelength of the sound wave? I can't change the wavelength.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K