Calculate Time for Stone to Hit Bottom of 180m Well at 20C

  • Thread starter Thread starter samisoccer9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the total time for a stone dropped from a height of 180 meters to hit the bottom of a well and for the sound of the impact to travel back to the surface at an air temperature of 20°C. The speed of sound is calculated using the formula Vsound = 331.4 + 0.59 x T, resulting in a speed of 343.4 m/s. The time for sound to travel back is approximately 0.52 seconds, while the time for the stone to fall, calculated using kinematic equations with an acceleration of 9.81 m/s², contributes to a total time of 6.6 seconds. The mass of the stone does not affect the fall time due to the principles of gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, particularly D = vt.
  • Knowledge of the speed of sound calculation at varying temperatures.
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²).
  • Basic principles of physics regarding free fall and sound propagation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply kinematic equations for free fall problems.
  • Study the derivation and implications of the speed of sound in different mediums.
  • Explore the effects of initial velocity on free fall calculations.
  • Investigate the relationship between mass and acceleration in gravitational contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and sound propagation in a gravitational field.

samisoccer9
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


  1. A woman drops a stone into a well 180 m deep. If the air temperature is 20 oC, how much time will elapse between the moment the stone is dropped and the moment the sound of the stone hitting the bottom of the well is heard? [6.6s]
[/B]

Homework Equations


Vsound = 331.4 + .59 x T
vt = d or one of the big five equations regarding kinematics?

The Attempt at a Solution


i find the new velocity of sound to be 343.2 m/s using the above equation, and i then tried to multiply the distance, 180m, by two, as sound travels there and back, and then take the equation t = d/v, t = 360/343.2, but it didnt give the right answer. i believe it has do to with kinematics regarding freefall maybe, or just incorporating accel. answer is 6.6s ^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sound doesn't travel there and back, unless the woman is shouting at the stone and listening for the echo. Instead, first the stone drops and hits the bottom (how long does this take ? ) then the sound travels to the surface (how long does that take ? )
 
Last edited:
I apologize if this is incorrect, but I believe that you do not have enough information. It would be the time that it takes the rock to travel to the bottom, plus the time it would take the sound to go from the bottom to top of the well. So, you can get one side of that by having the speed of sound at about 343.4 m/s (I believe to be more exact it would be 343.59 but let's keep it at 343.4 for now), and set up a proportion 343.4m/1s=180/xs. This would make x= about .52 seconds. Now, you would need to calculate how long it would take for the stone to get to the bottom. We can use D=vt for this, but we don't have a value for v. Let's plug in ma for v (because F=ma, and this is gravity so F=s). Your problem does not state the mass of the stone or the acceleration of the stone.
 
@Isaac0427, you are correct that the initial velocity of the stone would change the answer, but I think we should assume that "drops", with no other qualification, means with zero initial velocity.

The mass of the stone however is not relevant as far as its fall under the influence of gravity is concerned.
 
Last edited:
wabbit said:
@Isaac0427, you are correct that the initial velocity of the stone would change the answer, but I think we should assume that "drops", with no other qualification, means with zero initial velocity.

The mass of the stone however is not relevant as far as its fall under the influence of gravity is concerned.
Really? I thought that a larger object falls with more velocity than a larger one.
 
Now earlier today I got to the same part as @Isaac0427, with 0.52s being the time for sound to travel. Then I was still stick at attempting the stone, as since t = D/V, i was not sure which velocity i could use to solve for this part of the problem
 
samisoccer9 said:
Now earlier today I got to the same part as @Isaac0427, with 0.52s being the time for sound to travel. Then I was still stick at attempting the stone, as since t = D/V, i was not sure which velocity i could use to solve for this part of the problem
That's exactly my point. There is no velocity in this. For the answer to be 6.6 seconds the average velocity would have to be about 29.6 m/s.
 
Isaac0427 said:
Really? I thought that a larger object falls with more velocity than a larger one.
No, this was the point of Galileo's experiment (see link in my previous reply). The effect of gravity is a force proportional to the mass of the stone, but then the effect of a force is an *acceleration* inversely proportional to that mass - and the two cancel out.

To go back to the original problem, the remaining issue is to determine the duration of the fll, starting from an initial velocity of 0m/s and applying a constant acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2.
 
@wabbit How would the remainder of the solution be carried out then ?
 
  • #10
If you assume a constant acceleration ## g=9.81m/s^2 ## and starting velocity ## v(0)=0m/s ##, what is the velocity ## v(t) ##? Given that, what is the depth ## x(t) ## reached at time t after the drop ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K