Dropsheet-duct tape wall in The Martian

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of Mark Watney's pressure wall in "The Martian," specifically the structural integrity of a pool made from 3M 6969 Duct Tape. The calculations indicate that with a pressure of 0.5 atmospheres, the equivalent water column height would be 5 meters, which is unrealistic for a 10-foot diameter pool. Further analysis using Barlow's formula reveals that the maximum radius for a greenhouse constructed with 3M 6969 Duct Tape, given its tensile strength of 20.7 MPa, would only allow for a radius of 27.8 cm, necessitating at least 18 layers of duct tape for a 10-meter diameter structure. The discussion humorously critiques the unrealistic physics portrayed in the film.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly pressure and tensile strength.
  • Familiarity with Barlow's formula for structural integrity calculations.
  • Knowledge of duct tape specifications, specifically 3M 6969 Duct Tape.
  • Awareness of atmospheric pressure differences between Earth and Mars.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Barlow's formula and its applications in engineering.
  • Investigate the tensile strength and thickness specifications of various duct tape brands.
  • Learn about atmospheric pressure and its effects on structural design in extraterrestrial environments.
  • Explore the concept of "Somebody else's Problem" and "Cartoon Physics" in science fiction narratives.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, science fiction enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the realistic application of physics in film and literature.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,259
Reaction score
8,392
TL;DR
How much "weight" is Watney's magical dropsheet actually holding?
While not managing to sleep, I was trying to calculate how deep a pool of water would be to simulate Watney's pressure wall holding in the Hab atmo.

Let's say, generously, the air pressure in the Hab was a mere 0.5 atmos. That's .51kg/cm^2.

Mars is .02 atmos, so effectively vacuum. We can discount it.

So, if we brought it to Earth and turned it on its side and made a 10 foot diamter swimming pool out of it, every square centimetre is holding 500cm^3 of water - or a column 5 metres tall.

So, Watney has built a 10 foot wide suspended pool on Earth - whose bottom is made of magic dropsheet and duct tape, and it is holding up all the water in a pool that's 5 metres deep??

Did I miss a decimal point somewhere?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's magical movie set duct tape. :smile:
 
phinds said:
It's magical movie set duct tape. :smile:
Like the Force it is. A light side and a dark side it has. Binds the universe together it does.

But yeah, I agree Dave's calculations. If the guy used pure oxygen (and just lived with the fire hazard) could he reduce pressure to 0.2 bar? That would reduce the swimming pool equivalent to about 2m deep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
What's the matter with you guys? Watney never did the calculation before putting it together and it worked! You missed the point. If you don't know about it, it ceases to be a problem. Same idea as not testing for COVID 19: you don't test, the number of cases goes down. Sheesh! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds
kuruman said:
What's the matter with you guys? Watney never did the calculation before putting it together and it worked! You missed the point. If you don't know about it, it ceases to be a problem. Same idea as not testing for COVID 19, you don't test, the number of cases goes down. Sheesh! :rolleyes:
Yeah! We all know that! Like… it's if you don't take the pregnancy test, you can't be pregnant. Or if you don't have a temperature gauge in your car, it can't overheat. There's lotsa stuff like that.
 
kuruman said:
If you don't know about it, it ceases to be a problem.

Given that nature is in on it as well, I suspect Watneys case is some kind of combination of Somebody else's Problem and Cartoon Physics.

Perhaps the two phenomenon are related via some corollaries, like Cartoon Physics being natures version of SEP. Sort of nature thinks that humans knows what they are doing and stop worrying about getting all the tiny wheel of nature to turn exactly right. I mean, it must be exhausting for nature to be so diligent all the time, right?

On the other hand, given Occam's razor the magic movie duct tape is perhaps the simplest, but less interesting, explanation of this case. Watney clearly have gravity and other aspects of mechanics working OK and nature do punish him in other regards on several occasions so clearly not all is under influence of SEP and CP. And also, magic duct tape is pretty strong, especially the standard grey version.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Filip Larsen said:
Given that nature is in on it as well, I suspect Watneys case is some kind of combination of Somebody else's Problem and Cartoon Physics.
I like the "Hitchhiker's Guide..." SEP reference, one of my fav's :biggrin:
 
Ibix said:
But yeah, I agree Dave's calculations. If the guy used pure oxygen (and just lived with the fire hazard) could he reduce pressure to 0.2 bar? That would reduce the swimming pool equivalent to about 2m deep.

That's still too much. According to the Barlow's formula the maximum radius of the green house is given by

##r = \frac{{\sigma \cdot s}}{p}##

with the pressure ##p##, the maximum tensile strength ##\sigma## and the thickness ##s##.

3M 6969 Duct Tape has a thickness of 0.272 mm and a tensile strength at break of 20.7 MPa. With a pressure of 20.265 kPa the maxium radius would be just 27.8 cm. Watney's green house reather looks like 10 meters in diameter. That would require at least 18 layers of duct tape.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K