In Seminole County, Florida, judges have dismissed numerous DUI cases due to the breath-alcohol testing machines' manufacturers refusing to disclose their operational details, including software source code. This has led to a significant drop in conviction rates, with some judges asserting that defendants have a right to access this information to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the tests. The discussion highlights a divide among judges, with some arguing that the state cannot provide information it does not possess, while others emphasize the necessity of transparency for fair trials. Participants express concerns about the implications of undisclosed machine operations, including potential biases and inaccuracies that could affect test results. The debate also touches on the broader legal principle that defendants should have access to all relevant evidence and methods used against them, reinforcing the need for accountability in the use of scientific instruments in legal contexts. Overall, the conversation underscores the tension between technological confidentiality and the rights of defendants in the judicial system.