MHB DW123's question at Yahoo Answers regarding partial fraction decomposition

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello DW123,

We are give to decompose:

$\displaystyle f(x)=\frac{-10x-7}{2x^2-17x+21}$

Our first step is to factor the numerator and denominator:

$\displaystyle f(x)=-\frac{10x+7}{(2x-3)(x-7)}$

Now, we will assume the decomposition will take the form:

$\displaystyle -\frac{10x+7}{(2x-3)(x-7)}=\frac{A}{2x-3}+\frac{B}{x-7}$

Using the Heaviside cover-up method, we may find the value of $A$ by covering up the factor $(2x-3)$ on the left side, and evaluate what's left where $x$ takes on the value of the root of the covered up factor, i.e., $\displaystyle x=\frac{3}{2}$. Hence:

$\displaystyle A=-\frac{10\cdot\frac{3}{2}+7}{\frac{3}{2}-7}=4$

Likewise, we find the value of $B$ by covering up the factor $(x-7)$ on the left side, and evaluate what's left for $x=7$:

$\displaystyle B=-\frac{10\cdot7+7}{2\cdot7-3}=-7$

And so we conclude that:

$\displaystyle f(x)=\frac{-10x-7}{2x^2-17x+21}=\frac{4}{2x-3}-\frac{7}{x-7}$

To DW123 or any other guests viewing this topic, partial fraction decomposition is sometimes taught in pre-calculus, but usually in calculus as a means of integrating functions, so if you have other related questions, please feel free to post them in:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f21/

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top