Dynamics: planar kinetics of a rigid body (impulse and momentum)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 4K views
silentwf
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/7379/87835960.png
[itex]r_{i}=.3 m \text{ and } r_{o}=.9 m[/itex]
The spool has a weight of 300N and a radius of gyration [itex]k_{O}[/itex] = .45 m. A cord is wrapped around its inner hub and the end subjected to a horizontal force P = 50N. Determine the spool's angular velocity in 4seconds starting from rest. Assume the spool rolls without slipping.


Homework Equations


[itex]\int_{0}^{t}{P\cdot r_{i}}{dt} = mv_{O}r_{i} + I_{O}\omega[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\left \{ \begin{matrix}\int_{0}^{4}{50 \cdot 0.3}{dt} = \frac{300}{9.81}\cdot v_{O}\cdot0.9 + \frac{300}{9.81}\cdot 0.45^{2} \cdot \omega\\v_{O}=0.9\omega\end{matrix}[/itex]
Solving the two equations i get [itex]\omega = 1.94 \text{rad/s}[/itex]

The book provides the solution as follows
[itex]\left \{ \begin{matrix}<br /> 50(0.9 - 0.3)4 = \frac{300}{9.81}v_{O}\cdot 0.9+\frac{300}{9.81}\cdot.45^{2}\omega \\<br /> v_{O}=\omega\cdot0.9 \end{matrix}[/itex]
I don't get why the book does .9 - .3 for its radius, i thought it was around point O?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi silentwf! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and an integral: ∫ :wink:)
silentwf said:
Assume the spool rolls without slipping.

[itex]\int_{0}^{t}{P\cdot r_{i}}{dt} = mv_{O}r_{i} + I_{O}\omega[/itex]

I don't get why the book does .9 - .3 for its radius, i thought it was around point O?

[STRIKE]You can't take moments about the centre of mass (O) when it is accelerating.

But you can always take moments about the centre of rotation (A).[/STRIKE]

If you take moments about the centre of mass (O), you need to take the torque of the friction force at A into account.

To avoid that, use A instead of O, so that the friction torque is zero.

So all you need is the torque of P about A, for which the distance is 0.6 :wink:
 
Last edited:
oops!

I've changed my mind …

the conclusion of my last post is still correct (that you must take moments about A, not about O), but the reasoning wasn't, so I've edited it. :redface: