Dynamics: Relative Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of relative acceleration in dynamics, specifically how to correctly construct a vector triangle to determine the relative velocity \(\vec v_{A/B}\). The user initially misapplied the Law of Cosines, resulting in an incorrect value of 2.057544 m/s. The correct approach involves recognizing that the angle between \(-\vec v_{B}\) and \(\vec v_{A}\) is obtuse, necessitating the addition of vectors \(\vec a_A\) and \(-\vec a_B\) to accurately represent the relative acceleration \(\vec a_A - \vec a_B\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition and subtraction
  • Familiarity with the Law of Cosines
  • Knowledge of relative motion concepts in physics
  • Ability to interpret and construct vector diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Learn the Law of Cosines and its applications in vector analysis
  • Explore the concept of relative motion and acceleration
  • Practice constructing vector diagrams for various motion scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on dynamics and vector analysis, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts of relative acceleration and vector diagrams.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116

Homework Statement


The problem is in the image attached below
IMG_6185.JPG


2. Homework Equations


In the working below (although I think I have misunderstood a concept)

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is in the attached image.
IMG_6186.jpg


I tried to leave the numbers out until the end. I have not written the exact working as I did it in draft elsewhere. I used the Law of Cosines on the vector triangle, in order to obtain \vec v_{A/B}, which came out as 2.057544... m/s. But that is not the correct answer.

Upon reflection, I have realized that I was supposed to draw the vector triangle such that the angle between - \vec v_{B} and \vec v_{A} is obtuse. How should one decide on how to draw the vector triangle?

Many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 318
  • IMG_6186.jpg
    IMG_6186.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 532
  • IMG_6185.JPG
    IMG_6185.JPG
    47.7 KB · Views: 699
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to construct ##\vec a_A - \vec a_B##, which is the same as ##\vec a_A + (- \vec a_B)##. So, your diagram should show ##\vec a_A## and ## (- \vec a_B)## added together.
 
TSny said:
You need to construct ##\vec a_A - \vec a_B##, which is the same as ##\vec a_A + (- \vec a_B)##. So, your diagram should show ##\vec a_A## and ## (- \vec a_B)## added together.
Thanks for your response, it makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K