What is the Relationship between E, D and P in a Material?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roodles01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between electric field (E), electric displacement (D), and polarization (P) in a thick sheet of polystyrene with a relative permittivity (ε) of 2.5, subjected to a uniform electric field of 500 Vm-1. The calculations reveal that the internal electric field (Ein) is 200 Vm-1 and the electric displacement (Dout) is 1.77 x 10-9 C/m2. The confusion arises regarding the use of ε0 in the equation Din = ε0Ein + Pin, as opposed to using ε, which is clarified through boundary conditions and the definitions of the quantities involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with electric displacement and polarization concepts
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in electromagnetism
  • Basic grasp of relative permittivity and its implications in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relationship between D, E, and P in dielectric materials
  • Learn about boundary conditions in electrostatics and their applications
  • Explore the concept of polarization in different materials and its effects on electric fields
  • Investigate the role of relative permittivity in the behavior of dielectric materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone studying the behavior of materials in electric fields, particularly in relation to dielectrics and their properties.

Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
A problem involving E, D & P. I have the answer but not sure why for the P bit.A bit of clarification if someone could, please.

A thick sheet of polystyrene, of relative permittivity ε = 2.5, is placed
normal to a uniform electric field of magnitude 500Vm−1 in air.

Find the magnitudes of the electric field E, the electric displacement D and the polarization P inside the material.

OK div D = ρf
and D = εε0E
Boundary conditions Doutside = Dinside → εoutEout = εε0Ein

so
Ein = Eout / ε
Ein = 500/2.5
Ein = 200 Vm-1

Dout = Din = ε0 Eout
Dout = 8.85x10-12 x 200
Dout = 1.77x10-9


Fine so far . . .

When I get down to calculating P I have to use

Din = ε0Ein + Pin

why, when everything else has the suffix "in" do I use ε0? Shouldn't it be just plain ε?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K