E Field Magnitude at Origin due to Single Charge 5cm Above

  • Thread starter Thread starter sasuke07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Magnitude
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnitude of the electric field at the origin due to a single charge positioned 5 cm above the horizontal axis. Participants are comparing this scenario to a previous question involving a negative charge located 5 cm to the left of the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Coulomb's law and question why the magnitudes differ despite using similar parameters. There is exploration of the implications of charge placement and distance in relation to the origin.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the assumptions made about charge placement and the implications for electric field calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the charge's position relative to the origin.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the coordinates of the charge in relation to the origin, as well as the interpretation of the problem statement. Participants are encouraged to clarify the details of the questions being compared.

sasuke07
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the magnitude of the E field at the origin due to a single charge (either the + or the -) located 5 cm above the horizontal axis?

Homework Equations


KQ/D^2



The Attempt at a Solution


in an earlier question it asked What is the direction and magnitude of the E field at the origin due to the single negative charge (ignore all others) on the horizontal axis?" SO i used columbs law "KQ/d^2, (8.99x10^9x30x10^-9)/.05^2 and i got 1.1x10^5 which was the correct answer, but this questions answer is supposed to be 5.4X10^4. I was wondering why this is the case as all the numbers are the same from an earlier question, exepct now its vertical.
 

Attachments

  • Chargelines.gif
    Chargelines.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
Please provide earlier question :)
 
the earlier question was "What is the direction and magnitude of the E field at the origin due to the single negative charge (ignore all others) on the horizontal axis?"
 
and the present question?
 
I didn't get how all the numbers are same in both question , aren't they different
 
Because in both questions you are still 5 cm away from the e field, and the charges are still 30 nc. The first question the negative charge is to the left of the center and in the second question the charge (the problem said could be + or -) is 5 cm above the center. So aren't the numbers the same if i were to use the same equation?
 
Sorry in question 1 the negative charge is 5 cm to the left of the origin and question 2 the charge is 5 cm above the origin.
 
but the number of charges are different , they are infinite
and also they are distributed along lines not at a point
 
just for the sake of imagination
think of a person pushing a box with the help of a rope alone
and think many people pushing a box with many ropes
 
  • #10
aren't there only 1 charge in both questions as question 1 says to ignore the other charges and question 2 says there is a single charge? would i have to use a different formula?
 
  • #11
i really wish if you could post both the question exactly separated by space , i am confused
 
  • #12
Sorry
1."What is the direction and magnitude of the E field at the origin due to the single negative charge (ignore all others) on the horizontal axis?"

2.What is the magnitude of the E field at the origin due to a single charge (either the + or the -) located 5 cm above the horizontal axis?

I know how to do 1, its just question 2 that's tripping me up.
 
  • #13
where is the particle placed in Q1
 
  • #14
particle is at the origin, and the negative charge is on the left
 
  • #15
left ? what is the coordinate?
 
  • #16
If you look at the picture the particle would be at the center and the negative charge is on the x-axis to the left of the origin. So it would be 5 cm away, as the entire horizantel axis is 10cm.
 
  • #17
see magnitude of electric field will be same for all points whose distance from the particle is same
 
  • #18
locus will be a sphere , where the whole surface will have same magnitude at all points on the surface
 
  • #19
See magnitude of electric field is same for all points which are equidistant to the particle ( which is a locus of a hollow sphere )
 
  • #20
Thats what i was thinking, but on the answer sheet the it said the magnitude of
1. was 1.1x10^5 N/C to left and for 2 it said the magnitude was 5.4X10^4 N/C. I am stumped as to how the magnitude could be different when all the numbers used is essentially the same.
 
  • #21
There might be something else you are missing
start completely new :0
 
  • #22
would you have an idea of what i could be missing. I posted everything related to the 2 questions and i can't think of anything. The only formula you could use is Columbs law, so ya
 
  • #23
See i can only think if you write both the questions exactly as they are without omitting anything , with the figure and everything given
 
  • #24
Im uploading a copy of where i am getting the questions. on the quiz they are questions 4 and 7. And you have the picture from my first post. Thats all the information that i received for this assignment.
 

Attachments

  • #25
questions 7 and 8 are the only 2 that i can't figure out for myself. So if you could help me out with either of the 2 that would be awesome.
 
  • #26
lol , this is so stupid ,
ok see here you are
In the 7th Question they are asking electric field due to a charge located 5 cm above horizontal axis in that given figure only .
now there can be 2 possible cases
1. + q (5,5)
2. - q (-5,5)

since they have asked for only one you take anyone of them
and the distance from the origin won't be 5
why? tell me
 
  • #27
holy ****, is it because the charge isn't on the vertical axis right above the origin but its off in the corner.
 
  • #28
Yea they haven't mention anything about x coordinate
and even in the figure there is no charge at (0.5)
There you go .

keep visiting PF :)
 
  • #29
thanks for sticking with this. can't believe i didn't see that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K