E&M separation of variables and Fourier

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a boundary value problem in electrostatics using separation of variables and Fourier series. The boundary conditions include specific values for the potential at various points, leading to a general solution expressed as a series involving sine functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of setting specific values for the variable k and the necessity of including a family of solutions to satisfy boundary conditions. Questions arise about the orthogonality of sine functions, the integration process related to coefficients, and the interpretation of results in the context of Fourier analysis.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the necessity of using a series solution to match boundary conditions, while others have clarified the concept of orthogonality in relation to the sine functions. There is an ongoing exploration of the integral solutions and their implications, with participants sharing their experiences and resources for further understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that some may lack background in differential equations, which affects their comprehension of the material. The discussion also reflects on the challenges of understanding Fourier analysis and its applications in the context of the problem presented.

Mike Jonese
Snapchat-1655340132.jpg

Homework Statement


Boundary conditions are i) V=0 when y=0 ii) V=0 when y=a iii) V=V0(y) when x=0 iv) V=0 when x app infinity.
I understand and follow this problem (separating vars and eliminated constants) until the potential
is found to be V(x,y) = Ce^(-kx)*sin(ky)

Condition ii implies that V(0,a) = Csin(k*a) = 0 so sin(ka) must =0 and k=n*π/a
Question 1) Why can't we just set k=π/a so that V(0,y) = Csin(πy/a) where V(0,a) = 0 and V(0,0) =0? This would not screw up the boundary condition and you wouldn't have to deal with infinite solutions because of n?

Homework Equations


Moving on,
Book give a more general solution that includes all the different solutions due to n
V(x,y) = (n=1---->inf)∑Cn*e^(-nπx/a)*sin(nπy/a)
V(0,y) = (n=1---->inf)∑Cn*sin(nπy/a) = V0(y)
and now we are trying to find the Coefficient C's that make this possible
I'm including the section here to save typing
Snapchat-697077882.jpg

I didn't realize the forum would kill the resolution
IMG_20171008_152001.jpg

IMG_20171008_152129.jpg

3.Attempt at solution
I tried, I don't understand this in general ( I haven't taken diff eqn yet)
Question 2. How can you solve the integral that leads to (3.32)
Question 3 How does V0(y) pop into the integrand in (3.32)
Question 4 how can the answer be 0 or a/2 based on n and n' (is this some type of delta fxn?)
Question 5 Can someone describe as you would to a 3rd grader why 3.36 is an answer and what it means. Is this just an approximation?
Question 6. What makes something orthogonal in the sense of 3.32

I extremely appreciate and help or insight (or direction to external reference material) anyone might have. Thank you very much! -Mike


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mike Jonese said:
Question 1) Why can't we just set k=π/a so that V(0,y) = Csin(πy/a) where V(0,a) = 0 and V(0,0) =0? This would not screw up the boundary condition and you wouldn't have to deal with infinite solutions because of n?
Because you need the whole family of solutions in order to match the boundary condition ##V(0,y)=V_{0}(y)##. There is no way to make ##V(0,y)=C\text{sin}(\pi y/a)=V_{0}(y)## unless ##V_{0}## happens to be that specific sine function.
Mike Jonese said:
Question 2. How can you solve the integral that leads to (3.32)
The point is that the sine functions are orthogonal so the integral is zero if the n's are different and ##a/2## if the n's are the same number.
Mike Jonese said:
Question 3 How does V0(y) pop into the integrand in (3.32)
We know that at ##x=0##
$$V(0,y)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}C_{n}\text{sin}(n\pi y/a)=V_{0}(y)$$
The "trick" referenced is to first multiply both sides by ##\text{sin}(n^{\prime}\pi y/a)##
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}C_{n}\text{sin}(n\pi y/a)\text{sin}(n^{\prime}\pi y/a)=V_{0}(y)\text{sin}(n^{\prime}\pi y/a)$$
then integrate from 0 to ##a##
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}C_{n}\int_{0}^{a}\text{sin}(n\pi y/a)\text{sin}(n^{\prime}\pi y/a)dy=\int_{0}^{a}V_{0}(y)\text{sin}(n^{\prime}\pi y/a)dy$$
Mike Jonese said:
Question 4 how can the answer be 0 or a/2 based on n and n' (is this some type of delta fxn?)
Again, this is because sine functions are orthogonal. This means that when you integrate two of them over some number of half periods, then integral evaluates to zero if they have different frequencies or ##a/2## if they have the same frequency.
Mike Jonese said:
Question 5 Can someone describe as you would to a 3rd grader why 3.36 is an answer and what it means. Is this just an approximation?
I don't think I could explain Fourier analysis to a 3rd grader but Griffiths says just above this that he is now assuming that the potential is constant at ##x=0## so ##V_{0}(y)=V_{0}##. This causes ##V_{0}## to just pop out of the integral allowing you to just integrate the sine function as usual.
Mike Jonese said:
Question 6. What makes something orthogonal in the sense of 3.32
See answer to question 4.
Mike Jonese said:
I tried, I don't understand this in general ( I haven't taken diff eqn yet)
I was actually in the same position when I was learning E&M from Griffiths. I had only taken up to Calc III and spent hours carefully rereading this chapter until it finally hit me as to what was going on.
 
Thank you for taking the time to respond to that, that definitely shed some light on this. Do you happen to remember any good lecture notes online or youtube channels that you came across when you were taking the class that were good references? I found a youtube guy that goes through the same textbook but the quality is hit or miss. Anyways thanks again!
 
Mike Jonese said:
Thank you for taking the time to respond to that, that definitely shed some light on this. Do you happen to remember any good lecture notes online or youtube channels that you came across when you were taking the class that were good references? I found a youtube guy that goes through the same textbook but the quality is hit or miss. Anyways thanks again!
From what i remember I learned mostly from the book and my professor. It sounds like your main difficulty is the math, so I would suggest looking for books or websites on Fourier analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K