E. Potential Energy: Uniformly Charged Hollow Sphere and Point Charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric potential energy \( U \) of a uniformly charged hollow sphere and a point charge is defined as \( U = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r} \) at the surface of the hollow sphere, where \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \) are the charges of the sphere and the point charge, respectively, and \( r \) is the radius of the sphere. This relationship holds true under the assumption that the hollow sphere behaves like a point charge due to its spherical symmetry, as established by Newton's Shell Theorem. For distances greater than the radius of the sphere (\( R > r \)), the potential energy is given by \( U(R) = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{R} \), while for distances less than the radius (\( R < r \)), it remains \( U(R) = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with Newton's Shell Theorem
  • Knowledge of spherical charge distributions
  • Basic concepts of point charges in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Shell Theorem on non-spherical charge distributions
  • Explore the derivation of electric potential energy formulas for various charge configurations
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in relation to different geometrical shapes
  • Learn about the applications of electric potential energy in real-world electrostatic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and the behavior of charged objects in various configurations.

Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
I was doing a problem with this one detail. It says that the electric potential energy of an uniformly charged hollow sphere and a point charge is (at the surface of the hollow sphere; both positive): $$U = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r}$$ I guess this assumes that the hollow sphere is a point charge. Now my question is, does the electric potential energy depend on other physical properties of an object? Or is this like the Newton's Shell Theorem? What if the object wasn't spherical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heisenberg7 said:
I guess this assumes that the hollow sphere is a point charge.
You do not tell us what are q_1,q_2 and r so that we can follow your guess condifently.
BTW
U=k \sum_{i&lt;j}\frac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}}
is a fundamental rule for system of point charges whatever distributions they have.
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
You do not tell us what are q_1,q_2 and r so that we can follow your guess condifently.
Charge of the sphere and the point charge respectively. ##r## is the radius of the sphere. Now, in general, does it hold if ##R > r## (where ##R## represents the distance from the center)?
 
By the shell theorem, the field outside any spherically symmetric charge distribution is the same as that of a point charge with the same total charge at the center of the sphere. Yes, this is only true for spherically symmetric distributions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heisenberg7
Heisenberg7 said:
Now, in general, does it hold if R>r (where R represents the distance from the center)?
U(R)=k\frac{q_1q_2}{R} for R > r
U(R)=k\frac{q_1q_2}{r} for R < r
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heisenberg7

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K