MHB E1.4b Determinant with zero column

Click For Summary
The determinant of the given matrix is zero due to the presence of a column that can be transformed into all zeros, confirming that the determinant is zero. This is supported by the rule that states if two rows or columns are equal or one is a multiple of another, the determinant will also be zero. Row operations can simplify the matrix, with specific operations affecting the determinant's value. Adding a multiple of one row to another can create a row of zeros, leading to a determinant of zero when expanded. Thus, the matrix's structure inherently leads to a determinant of zero.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$$\left[\begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 &0 &2 &1\\
1 &1 &0 &1\\
1 &3 &4 &1\\
-1 &-3 &-4 &-1
\end{array}\right]=\color{red}{0}$$Answer (red) via W|Aok I did not do any operations on this
Since by observation the 4th column can become all zero'showever didn't see anything in the book to support this
only that the co-factor expansion would result in multiplying zeros throughoutany suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surely in your textbook there is the rule "If two rows or columns of a matrix are equal" (or the more general "if one row or column is a multiple of another") "then the determinant is 0". One way to evaluate the determinant of matrix is to use "row operations" to reduce the matrix to a simpler matrix. The row operations are "multiply an entire row by a constant", "swap two rows", and "add a multiple of on row to another". The first multiplies the determinant by that constant. The second multiplies the determinant by -1. The third does not change the determinant.

In particular, if two rows of a matrix are the same, adding -1 times one of those rows to the other gives a matrix having all "0"s in one row. "Expanding" on that row gives 0 as the determinant 0.

(Of course you can replace "row" by "column" thoughout.)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K