E2 - p2c2 = m2c4 - Meaning of symbols

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter particlemania
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation E2 - p2c2 = m2c4 illustrates the relationship between energy (E), momentum (p), and rest mass (m) in the context of special relativity. The Lorentz factor plays a crucial role in defining relativistic momentum as p = mv/√(1 - v2/c2), where c represents the speed of light. Both energy and momentum depend on velocity, but their squared difference yields an invariant result, m2c4, applicable to all observers. This foundational equation highlights the dual nature of energy as comprising both positive and negative components, a concept further explored through the Dirac sea theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum relationships
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and Dirac sea theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Lorentz factor in relativistic physics
  • Explore the Dirac sea concept in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the relationship between energy and spacetime in general relativity
  • Learn about the significance of invariant quantities in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of energy and momentum in the context of relativity and quantum mechanics.

  • #31


aeon.rs said:
From that quotation we can draw the conlusion that the solutions of the relativistic energy equation E2 = m2c4+p2c2 are as follows: (1) in classical physics we could keep the positive values separate from the negative ones, (2) in quantum mechanics the positive and negative values do not tend to separate neatly; each of the two roots has to be considered as a possibility, so even an “unphysical negative energy” has to be considered as a physical possibility (3) in relativity we do not have a clear cut procedure for ruling out negative square root.
(3) should say that in relativistic quantum mechanics we do not have a clear-cut procedure. In the non-quantum version of relativity we do--that's what he meant by "classical physics" here.
aeon.rs said:
Even Dirac when he took antiparticle to solve the problem, he obliged to introduce the concept of “the ocean of occupied negative energy states” which is now referred to as the Dirac Sea (the same book p. 624-625).
My understanding is that the modern version of quantum field theory basically gets rid of the whole "Dirac Sea" idea, antiparticles are no longer viewed as "holes" but as particles in their own right. See this section of the wikipedia article, or this thread from physicsforums, or the last paragraph before "Free Space Solutions" in this google books result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


JesseM said:
(3) should say that in relativistic quantum mechanics we do not have a clear-cut procedure. In the non-quantum version of relativity we do--that's what he meant by "classical physics" here.

My understanding is that the modern version of quantum field theory basically gets rid of the whole "Dirac Sea" idea, antiparticles are no longer viewed as "holes" but as particles in their own right. See this section of the wikipedia article, or this thread from physicsforums, or the last paragraph before "Free Space Solutions" in this google books result.

Thank you, you are right. The original text of the quotation was written within the context of quantum mechanics. But the bottom line I would like to express is that we can not take the possibility of the existence of such negative energies very lightly. For me the presence of this symmetry, the pairing of these opposite energies and their interplay will substantially enrich the relativity theory and empower it to resolve the troubles we have both at the cosmic and quantum levels.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
833
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K