Early Abstract Algebra Problem - Pinter's Textbook

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the problem B7 from Chapter 2 of Charles C. Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra, Second Edition," which asks whether the operation defined by x*y = xy/(x+y+1) is associative. Participants in the forum consistently arrive at the conclusion that the operation is associative, yielding the same results for both x*(y*z) and (x*y)*z. However, the textbook claims the operation is not associative, leading to confusion among readers who believe the book's solution may be incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of abstract algebra concepts, specifically operations and associativity.
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and manipulation of fractions.
  • Knowledge of Charles C. Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra, Second Edition."
  • Ability to perform algebraic proofs and verify mathematical identities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of associativity in algebraic structures.
  • Study examples of non-associative operations in abstract algebra.
  • Explore alternative proofs for associativity using different operations.
  • Examine the implications of errors in mathematical textbooks and their impact on learning.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, educators teaching algebraic concepts, and anyone interested in verifying mathematical operations and their properties.

physicsforum7
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem is from Charles C. Pinter's A Book of Abstract Algebra, Second Edition. The problem is B7 of Chapter 2.Show that the operation * is either associative or not.

x*y=\frac{xy}{x+y+1} This problem seems simple to me: I keep arriving at YES for an answer; more specifically,

x*(y*z)=(x*y)*z=\frac{xyz}{xy+xz+yz+x+y+z+1}.

However, the solution in the back claims that the answer is NO, the operation is not associative. More specifically,

x*(y*z)=\frac{xyz(y+z+1)}{xy+xz+yz+x+y+z+1}.

(x*y)*z= \frac{xyz(x+y+1)}{xy+xz+yz+x+y+z+1}.

After working the problem through several times, I'm pretty sure this is a mistake in the book. But I would greatly appreciate feedback so that I can be sure I'm not doing something terribly wrong.

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you. The operation seems to be associative.
 
I also get the same result.
 
But surely your text does not "Show that the operation * is either associative or not."
Every operation is "either associative or not"!

Better wording would be "Determine whether the operation * is either associative or not."
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K